>Nu blijkt, los van de wankele positie van Schlitz, dat ook het persoonlijk logo van N-VA-kopstuk Zuhal Demir op een brochure prijkt van een pilootproject door de federale overheid. Het dateert nog van toen ze, net als Schlitz nu, staatssecretaris van Gelijke Kansen was.
Ontslag
´ja maar voor haar is het anders´ somehow
The main point is not that an administration uses a logo on projects – subsidized or not-, but that a minister/state secretary tells to parliament “my administration did this without knowledge” and then emails surface wherein she explicit directs organisations to use her logo.
In general, we should have something like the Rijksvoorlichtingdienst of the Netherlands to handle all government communication rather than individual cabinets. Unfortunately that would require a neutral and non-politic civil service culture which we don’t have.
I for one hope that the NVA isn’t like the GOP and their next topic of complaint will be “X are pedophiles” and then a high ranking member of theirs is actually a pedo.
Grootste reden dat iedereen plots maar ok was met Schiltz
Waarom hebben deze mensen überhaupt eigen logo’s?
“Als je samen in de beerput zit moet je niet met kak gooien”
– Michael Van Peel
For fuck’s sake I actually started to appreciate her.
That’s our tax money in those projects and yet they put their name on it. This is disgusting.
It’s unbelievable how all these muppets have personal logo’s, and are such incredible ego-trippers that they actually care about when and where those are used. As if anyone besides themselves would ever look at them.
Not that this practice should continue of course. If only because their ego’s don’t deserve such self-flattery.
Wtf is dat met die belachelijke persoonlijke logo’s!? Hebben alle politiekers dat?
13 comments
>Nu blijkt, los van de wankele positie van Schlitz, dat ook het persoonlijk logo van N-VA-kopstuk Zuhal Demir op een brochure prijkt van een pilootproject door de federale overheid. Het dateert nog van toen ze, net als Schlitz nu, staatssecretaris van Gelijke Kansen was.
Ontslag
´ja maar voor haar is het anders´ somehow
The main point is not that an administration uses a logo on projects – subsidized or not-, but that a minister/state secretary tells to parliament “my administration did this without knowledge” and then emails surface wherein she explicit directs organisations to use her logo.
In general, we should have something like the Rijksvoorlichtingdienst of the Netherlands to handle all government communication rather than individual cabinets. Unfortunately that would require a neutral and non-politic civil service culture which we don’t have.
I for one hope that the NVA isn’t like the GOP and their next topic of complaint will be “X are pedophiles” and then a high ranking member of theirs is actually a pedo.
Grootste reden dat iedereen plots maar ok was met Schiltz
Waarom hebben deze mensen überhaupt eigen logo’s?
“Als je samen in de beerput zit moet je niet met kak gooien”
– Michael Van Peel
For fuck’s sake I actually started to appreciate her.
That’s our tax money in those projects and yet they put their name on it. This is disgusting.
It’s unbelievable how all these muppets have personal logo’s, and are such incredible ego-trippers that they actually care about when and where those are used. As if anyone besides themselves would ever look at them.
Not that this practice should continue of course. If only because their ego’s don’t deserve such self-flattery.
Wtf is dat met die belachelijke persoonlijke logo’s!? Hebben alle politiekers dat?
Hoe zien die logo’s er uit?
“persoonlijk logo” ???