“This discourages participation.” If participation is implying someone is an unfit parent with zero evidence then it should be discouraged.
Clearly they’ve gone beyond basic political discussion and respect.
That’s ridiculous to leave a mark against her and her kids on record.
Some things transcend party politics, this is one.
England’s gonna England. Y’all hate each other with a passion that borders on tumescent.
Perhaps she shouldn’t have used her children as political props in the debating chamber of the Commons?
Can anyone help with this bit here? I have no idea what it means:
They then told her they thought she was the person who may be at risk “because of the way in which this person is targeting me”, she said, adding social services wanted to know how to raise concerns about her safety with the parliamentary policing system.
6 comments
[deleted]
“This discourages participation.” If participation is implying someone is an unfit parent with zero evidence then it should be discouraged.
Clearly they’ve gone beyond basic political discussion and respect.
That’s ridiculous to leave a mark against her and her kids on record.
Some things transcend party politics, this is one.
England’s gonna England. Y’all hate each other with a passion that borders on tumescent.
Perhaps she shouldn’t have used her children as political props in the debating chamber of the Commons?
Can anyone help with this bit here? I have no idea what it means:
They then told her they thought she was the person who may be at risk “because of the way in which this person is targeting me”, she said, adding social services wanted to know how to raise concerns about her safety with the parliamentary policing system.
She was the one at risk of what?