I find it a bit suspicious when they make these statements about “record number of children held as terrorists” and then link “7 terror attacks have been stopped since the pandemic began”.
Firstly, what were these children doing to deem them complicit in terror crimes. How may children are sufficiently ideologically motivated to carry out mass murder? And are their parents/influential adult friends also arrested?
Secondly, this vague statement of “stopping attacks” is not reassuring in the slightest. What were those attacks? How close were they to be successful?
Funny that a “we’re stopping terrorism” stories come out today, when the MET are criticized for inaction against the Tories and the Tories need a “we’re here to protect you” story.
>The UK terror threat level was raised to severe, meaning an attack is highly likely, after an explosion outside Liverpool Women’s Hospital last month.
>A taxi driver survived the blast but his passenger was killed when the homemade bomb exploded on Remembrance Sunday, just before 11:00 GMT.
The way the BBC report things is so weird sometimes. Why make it sound like the passenger was the innocent victim of a random explosion when **he was the bomber** ?
Let’s sweep it under the carpet and act like it never happened.
They mean kids drawing graffiti such as swasticas and other daft stuff. The textbooks I used in school would be considered crimes against humanity today. Maybe don’t let little children being idiots upset you?
5 comments
This is abetter article covering this expensive and ineffectual strategy https://www.ft.com/content/a82e18b4-1ea3-11e9-b126-46fc3ad87c65
I find it a bit suspicious when they make these statements about “record number of children held as terrorists” and then link “7 terror attacks have been stopped since the pandemic began”.
Firstly, what were these children doing to deem them complicit in terror crimes. How may children are sufficiently ideologically motivated to carry out mass murder? And are their parents/influential adult friends also arrested?
Secondly, this vague statement of “stopping attacks” is not reassuring in the slightest. What were those attacks? How close were they to be successful?
Funny that a “we’re stopping terrorism” stories come out today, when the MET are criticized for inaction against the Tories and the Tories need a “we’re here to protect you” story.
>The UK terror threat level was raised to severe, meaning an attack is highly likely, after an explosion outside Liverpool Women’s Hospital last month.
>A taxi driver survived the blast but his passenger was killed when the homemade bomb exploded on Remembrance Sunday, just before 11:00 GMT.
The way the BBC report things is so weird sometimes. Why make it sound like the passenger was the innocent victim of a random explosion when **he was the bomber** ?
Let’s sweep it under the carpet and act like it never happened.
They mean kids drawing graffiti such as swasticas and other daft stuff. The textbooks I used in school would be considered crimes against humanity today. Maybe don’t let little children being idiots upset you?