Then again, the SNP would say anything to deflect from their own problems, at the moment.
I mean you can’t trust Starmer to keep pledges so there isn’t any point asking him to make more.
I feel like this is some big brain manouvering from the SNP:
– Wait for Labour to make retarded policy proposition Y that the SNP know is massively unpopular with the electorate (but apparently Labour don’t?)
– Make big song and dance about how it doesn’t go far enough and should also include X unrelated policy the SNP wants to *appear* supportive of but would actually harm their own interests if it happened for real
– Use song and dance to deflect from very real problems within the SNP itself because ‘look, we support X!’
– Capitalise on Labour falling on its face at the next election due to Y, but also knowing they won’t win enough seats to ever be expected to deliver X
Getting rid of FPTP is kinda like isildur scene in lord of the rings.
He could get rid of something that would immediately diminish the tories hold in this country but hes so corrupt that all he can think about is how it would benefit him.
Essentially he thinks hes the good guy but he is in fact another tory.
No party which wins a majority will ever change the voting system
Getting rid of FPTP is complex – in Scotland we have a very complex system which does result in approximate PR while also preserving constituency MSPs, and literally nobody understands it 🙂
I would rather Scotland had FPTP for Indy purposes, as it would show a huge majority for the SNP. People in England don’t see it because our system doesn’t produce huge majorities for one party.
6 comments
Then again, the SNP would say anything to deflect from their own problems, at the moment.
I mean you can’t trust Starmer to keep pledges so there isn’t any point asking him to make more.
I feel like this is some big brain manouvering from the SNP:
– Wait for Labour to make retarded policy proposition Y that the SNP know is massively unpopular with the electorate (but apparently Labour don’t?)
– Make big song and dance about how it doesn’t go far enough and should also include X unrelated policy the SNP wants to *appear* supportive of but would actually harm their own interests if it happened for real
– Use song and dance to deflect from very real problems within the SNP itself because ‘look, we support X!’
– Capitalise on Labour falling on its face at the next election due to Y, but also knowing they won’t win enough seats to ever be expected to deliver X
Getting rid of FPTP is kinda like isildur scene in lord of the rings.
He could get rid of something that would immediately diminish the tories hold in this country but hes so corrupt that all he can think about is how it would benefit him.
Essentially he thinks hes the good guy but he is in fact another tory.
No party which wins a majority will ever change the voting system
Getting rid of FPTP is complex – in Scotland we have a very complex system which does result in approximate PR while also preserving constituency MSPs, and literally nobody understands it 🙂
I would rather Scotland had FPTP for Indy purposes, as it would show a huge majority for the SNP. People in England don’t see it because our system doesn’t produce huge majorities for one party.