Det er stadig helt utroligt at Lars Seiers har valgt at lave sådan noget svindel, og helt utroligt at se danske medier ikke er gået mere til ham, i forhold til at han laver sådan noget.
Der har kun været sådan nogle mikrofonholder interview, hvor han har kunne sidde og fortælle om hvor mange penge han valuta er værd. Så er det da klart hat der er svært for hr og fru Danmark at gennemskue, når selv statsmedierne står i benovelse og lader ham fortælle at man kan købe øl på hans værtshus, for en valuta der skulle være milliarder værd.
Lars Seier er en shitcoin promotor.
Pump and dump på retail investorer
Sjov tendens de her cryptobanker har, til at miste gigantiske summer, uden nogen helt ved hvor pengene ryger hen.
Men jeg lover jer, en eller anden er blevet rigere.
Som onkel altid har sagt; “Sætter man røven i klaskehøjde, skal man være beredt på et los i røven.”
Og hvis en skandaleombrust slesk bankfilantrop tager røven på dig, med en kryptovaluta opkaldt efter et kuldsejlet krydstogtskib med en beruset blærerøv ved roret, så vil jeg vove at påstå der er noget naturlig udvælgelse i spil. Karma, måske nemesis, om man vil..
Én eller anden dag vælter Seiers luftkasteller, og jeg glæder mig til det sker. Hvorfor medierne og nykonfirmerede lommeliberalister har så travlt med at fluffe den sjofle finansjonglør, fatter jeg kraftedeme ikke.
Der findes kun Bitcoin, alt andet er shitcoins.
Not your keys, not your coins.
De eneste hårde penge på planeten er guld og Bitcoin.
Kek shitcoin nede. Tror heldigvis ikke Ark36 var godkendt til retail men i stedet 750k minimumsgrænse for investeringer ligesom den famøse Millionærklubben vært Mads Kristiansen med “New Deal Invest” (tidl. Læge og pokerspiller lol). Han tabte kun 76% i 2022, tror ikke man skal være læge for at erklære “patienten” død.
Tænker altid at investorgruppen i sådan nogle fonde må være dumme fodboldspillere med for mange penge og tidl. Minkavlere som har hørt bageren snakke om en hurtig gevinst.
“Concordium is a public-layer 1, science-backed blockchain, designed to balance privacy with accountability through its ID layer”
Deres blockchain er baseret på “videnskab”. Sounds legit.
Dejligt
Lool – Seier din boomer sjoller
HAHA
Godt bevis for at der er ingen der gider undersøge tingene. Ser man på selve skabelsen, så er størstedelen lavet af en enkelt dude på Aarhus universitet, altså hvor blæst har man tilladelse lov til at være når ens job er at vurdere risiko.
Jeg kunne have sparet dem deres penge på 15 minutters research.
Det er fuldstændig de der kinesiske tindersvindlere i den anden tråd om igen…
Da jeg var inde og læse de der hævder Concordium skulle kunne gøre virker det ellers som en ret god ide.
Om det er så muligt det er så en anden sag.
There are obviously some of you who lack the necessary knowledge about either Concordium or Ark36.
Concordium blockchain is stable and a good product, but their marketing and entry into the liquid market have been a disaster, and it remains uncertain if they will recover from it.
Ark36 made a purchase in early 2021 at a price of 0.017 EUR in a private sale. It was a reasonable purchase at that time. They only invested 100,000 EUR, which is a very small portion of their total assets under management (AUM). Buying pre-market carries significant risks, but also the potential for substantial rewards.
The challenge is as follows: to record the value within the fund before their coin enters the market, considering the subsequent private sales that were conducted at higher prices.
So, the value could potentially increase between 0.017 EUR to around 0.45 EUR before the launch.
The challenge lies in finding the right balance for setting the price. If the price is not increased, new participants in the fund will enter at a very low price while existing customers have taken the risk. If the price is set too high, new participants will enter at an inflated price, and those exiting the fund will do so at an artificially high price.
On the second day of CCD trading on Bitfinex, the price opened at around 0.11 USD. at a big gain from the buying price of ARK36
There are two negative actions taken by ARK36. Firstly, they set the price of CCD too high before being able to mark it to market. Secondly, they did not inform their customers about the significant drawdown in Concordium for a year. Investors were only made aware of it if they wanted to withdraw from the fund, resulting in a drawdown of xx% from their poor 2022 performance, plus an unexpected loss in value due to Concordium. ARK36 stated that they were unable to disclose this information and exclude it from their daily AUM calculation because they intended to file a lawsuit against Concordium. However, they have now given up on this plan according to their email to investors. This was pure spin and solely aimed at withholding information about their poor performances from the public.
Therefore, ARK36’s performance in 2022 has been much worse than what they communicated throughout the year. Losing 57% on an investment that originally amounted to only 100,000 EUR is quite remarkable. While ARK36 attributes the losses to the market and investor withdrawals, the primary reason is that throughout 2021 and early 2022, they continuously inflated the value from 100,000 EUR to around 2-3-4 million EUR without a market to support it. When the market finally revealed the true value, they concealed it until they could no longer do so, resulting in a significant decrease in AUM on paper, even though that value had been absent for a long time.
There are customers who have lost 75% of their investment in just 11 months. Approximately 55% was lost due to the poor performances of the fund itself, and subsequently, an additional 45% was lost due to Concordium losses, which they were only informed about when they wanted to exit and were not informed about beforehand.
18 comments
He, fucking pyramidespil.
Det er stadig helt utroligt at Lars Seiers har valgt at lave sådan noget svindel, og helt utroligt at se danske medier ikke er gået mere til ham, i forhold til at han laver sådan noget.
Der har kun været sådan nogle mikrofonholder interview, hvor han har kunne sidde og fortælle om hvor mange penge han valuta er værd. Så er det da klart hat der er svært for hr og fru Danmark at gennemskue, når selv statsmedierne står i benovelse og lader ham fortælle at man kan købe øl på hans værtshus, for en valuta der skulle være milliarder værd.
Lars Seier er en shitcoin promotor.
Pump and dump på retail investorer
Sjov tendens de her cryptobanker har, til at miste gigantiske summer, uden nogen helt ved hvor pengene ryger hen.
Men jeg lover jer, en eller anden er blevet rigere.
Som onkel altid har sagt; “Sætter man røven i klaskehøjde, skal man være beredt på et los i røven.”
Og hvis en skandaleombrust slesk bankfilantrop tager røven på dig, med en kryptovaluta opkaldt efter et kuldsejlet krydstogtskib med en beruset blærerøv ved roret, så vil jeg vove at påstå der er noget naturlig udvælgelse i spil. Karma, måske nemesis, om man vil..
Én eller anden dag vælter Seiers luftkasteller, og jeg glæder mig til det sker. Hvorfor medierne og nykonfirmerede lommeliberalister har så travlt med at fluffe den sjofle finansjonglør, fatter jeg kraftedeme ikke.
Der findes kun Bitcoin, alt andet er shitcoins.
Not your keys, not your coins.
De eneste hårde penge på planeten er guld og Bitcoin.
Kek shitcoin nede. Tror heldigvis ikke Ark36 var godkendt til retail men i stedet 750k minimumsgrænse for investeringer ligesom den famøse Millionærklubben vært Mads Kristiansen med “New Deal Invest” (tidl. Læge og pokerspiller lol). Han tabte kun 76% i 2022, tror ikke man skal være læge for at erklære “patienten” død.
Tænker altid at investorgruppen i sådan nogle fonde må være dumme fodboldspillere med for mange penge og tidl. Minkavlere som har hørt bageren snakke om en hurtig gevinst.
Ellers en fin hjemmeside de har https://concordium.com/ og nogle fine buzzwords.
“Concordium is a public-layer 1, science-backed blockchain, designed to balance privacy with accountability through its ID layer”
Deres blockchain er baseret på “videnskab”. Sounds legit.
Dejligt
Lool – Seier din boomer sjoller
HAHA
Godt bevis for at der er ingen der gider undersøge tingene. Ser man på selve skabelsen, så er størstedelen lavet af en enkelt dude på Aarhus universitet, altså hvor blæst har man tilladelse lov til at være når ens job er at vurdere risiko.
Jeg kunne have sparet dem deres penge på 15 minutters research.
Selve Concordium blockchainen er ret cool teknologi, lavet med hjælp fra virkeligt dygtige forskere: [https://cs.au.dk/research/centers/concordium/people-and-visitors](https://cs.au.dk/research/centers/concordium/people-and-visitors)
Cryptocurrency laget er måske så en anden snak, men selve teknologien og forskningen bag, fortjener ikke alt den hate.
Det er nemt at bryste sig af at have tjent masser af penge, når alt fucking går op 😂
Så er alle genier, jo.
[Web3 is Going Just Great](https://web3isgoinggreat.com/)
Det er fuldstændig de der kinesiske tindersvindlere i den anden tråd om igen…
Da jeg var inde og læse de der hævder Concordium skulle kunne gøre virker det ellers som en ret god ide.
Om det er så muligt det er så en anden sag.
There are obviously some of you who lack the necessary knowledge about either Concordium or Ark36.
Concordium blockchain is stable and a good product, but their marketing and entry into the liquid market have been a disaster, and it remains uncertain if they will recover from it.
Ark36 made a purchase in early 2021 at a price of 0.017 EUR in a private sale. It was a reasonable purchase at that time. They only invested 100,000 EUR, which is a very small portion of their total assets under management (AUM). Buying pre-market carries significant risks, but also the potential for substantial rewards.
The challenge is as follows: to record the value within the fund before their coin enters the market, considering the subsequent private sales that were conducted at higher prices.
So, the value could potentially increase between 0.017 EUR to around 0.45 EUR before the launch.
The challenge lies in finding the right balance for setting the price. If the price is not increased, new participants in the fund will enter at a very low price while existing customers have taken the risk. If the price is set too high, new participants will enter at an inflated price, and those exiting the fund will do so at an artificially high price.
On the second day of CCD trading on Bitfinex, the price opened at around 0.11 USD. at a big gain from the buying price of ARK36
There are two negative actions taken by ARK36. Firstly, they set the price of CCD too high before being able to mark it to market. Secondly, they did not inform their customers about the significant drawdown in Concordium for a year. Investors were only made aware of it if they wanted to withdraw from the fund, resulting in a drawdown of xx% from their poor 2022 performance, plus an unexpected loss in value due to Concordium. ARK36 stated that they were unable to disclose this information and exclude it from their daily AUM calculation because they intended to file a lawsuit against Concordium. However, they have now given up on this plan according to their email to investors. This was pure spin and solely aimed at withholding information about their poor performances from the public.
Therefore, ARK36’s performance in 2022 has been much worse than what they communicated throughout the year. Losing 57% on an investment that originally amounted to only 100,000 EUR is quite remarkable. While ARK36 attributes the losses to the market and investor withdrawals, the primary reason is that throughout 2021 and early 2022, they continuously inflated the value from 100,000 EUR to around 2-3-4 million EUR without a market to support it. When the market finally revealed the true value, they concealed it until they could no longer do so, resulting in a significant decrease in AUM on paper, even though that value had been absent for a long time.
There are customers who have lost 75% of their investment in just 11 months. Approximately 55% was lost due to the poor performances of the fund itself, and subsequently, an additional 45% was lost due to Concordium losses, which they were only informed about when they wanted to exit and were not informed about beforehand.