É a isso que chamam uma empresa têxtil agora? Centro tecnológico?
>Hugo Boss’s environment rating is ‘not good enough’. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it has a policy to protect biodiversity in its supply chain. It has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its own operations and supply chain but it is unclear whether it is on track to meet its target. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives in most of its supply chain.
>Its labour rating is ‘not good enough’. Some of its supply chain is certified by FLA Workplace Code of Conduct including all of the final stage of production. It received a score of 31-40% in the Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It has been linked with sourcing cotton from the Xinjiang region in China at risk of using Uyghur forced labour and has taken insufficient steps to remediate.
>Its animal rating is ‘not good enough’. It has a formal animal welfare policy aligned with Five Freedoms but has no clear mechanisms to implement. It uses leather and exotic animal hair. It states that it sources wool from non-mulesed sheep. It uses down certified by the Responsible Down Standard. It does not use fur, exotic animal skin or angora. It traces some animal products to the first stage of production.
2 comments
É a isso que chamam uma empresa têxtil agora? Centro tecnológico?
>Hugo Boss’s environment rating is ‘not good enough’. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it has a policy to protect biodiversity in its supply chain. It has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its own operations and supply chain but it is unclear whether it is on track to meet its target. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives in most of its supply chain.
>Its labour rating is ‘not good enough’. Some of its supply chain is certified by FLA Workplace Code of Conduct including all of the final stage of production. It received a score of 31-40% in the Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It has been linked with sourcing cotton from the Xinjiang region in China at risk of using Uyghur forced labour and has taken insufficient steps to remediate.
>Its animal rating is ‘not good enough’. It has a formal animal welfare policy aligned with Five Freedoms but has no clear mechanisms to implement. It uses leather and exotic animal hair. It states that it sources wool from non-mulesed sheep. It uses down certified by the Responsible Down Standard. It does not use fur, exotic animal skin or angora. It traces some animal products to the first stage of production.
>Hugo Boss is rated ‘Not good enough’ overall.
https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/hugo-boss