“I’m confident that nothing will happen whether I did anything wrong or not,” says Braverman.
She’s channeling her inner Frank Drebin. Please disperse. Nothing to see here.
>The Rishi Sunak has asked his ethics adviser about the case.
I’m noticing more and more instances of mistakes like this recently when it comes to BBC News articles.
I’m sure that’s the last we will hear of that matter then 😉
It would be embarrassing if she’s forced to resign for a second time in six months for breaching the code.
Will Sunak go full nuts and place Patel back in the job…still time for her to get sacked again too.
I’m interested to hear whether Braverman considers this kind of behaviour fits in with her much vaunted “British values” or not.
There are now 2 issues, neither of which are addressed.
1. The involvement of civil servants in this, which was serious enough that they complained.
2. Her office denying that the speeding offence had happened, and instructing her publically funded spads to lie to the press.
Both are resigning offences.
She wants the Tories to lose as badly as possible so that she can have a shot at the leadership.
Minister notorious for breaking ministerial rules is sure she didn’t break ministerial rules when involving the civil service in assisting with personal matters.
She really is a piece of shit. She’s the shit cherry on top of the shit cake.
The kicker is, if she just took it on the chin and did it, it would be a complete nothing story.
Isn’t this worded very similarly to Boris’ “I’ve been advised they weren’t parties” defence?
It’s trying to sidestep the issue that – in the Boris case – *he was fucking there*.
And in this case, it’s not denying that she asked the civil service to intervene, but that she’s ‘confident nothing untoward happened’
But, hey, it’s par for course with the current party…
When did the ‘honourable resignation’ become so optional?
I remember Lord Carrington resigning as Foreign Sec. for not spotting that the Argentines were serious about claiming the Falklands. If I remember correctly Thatcher was relutant to accept his resignation.
Patel did not resign when caught out operating her own foreign policy visit to Israel behind Prime Minister May’s back, she had to be sacked.
Was it Johnson who just decided to toss the rules in the bin? Yet he himself resigned..
She was attempting to abuse her position and power to imtimidate civil servants for preferential treatment. Thatsaclear fact. It depends how seriously you view it, I guess.
Even Simon Jenkins of the Guardian thinks this is a trivial storm in a teacup, blown out of all proportion.
Isn’t it time we deported this criminal to Rwanada?
she’ll get sacked for this sooner or later but I am so worn down I dont care.
a speeding ticket? there sewage in rivers. lawless cities and failing infrastructure. who cares?
I am really sick of this country and the absolute cunts we call a government
It’s all beyond a joke and it seems to get worse every day
I really don’t understand why this is such a big deal
I detest her. However, I don’t think the original thing is that bad at all.
Lying about it sure is though
We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong, as detailed in this report that we’re definitely going to release to the public as soon as I’ve dealt with this massive pile of paperwork. Oh and then we have that thing, you know the one. I might have to push it to next year but then we’ll definitely release it, unless the printer has jammed again.
Yes, she didn’t commit a serious offence like holding up a sign or carrying a rape alarm.
I’m confident Suella Braverman is a vicious righty bitch who I wouldn’t trust to watch a puppy for 5 minutes in case she tries to dagger its guts open
22 comments
“I’m confident that nothing will happen whether I did anything wrong or not,” says Braverman.
She’s channeling her inner Frank Drebin. Please disperse. Nothing to see here.
>The Rishi Sunak has asked his ethics adviser about the case.
I’m noticing more and more instances of mistakes like this recently when it comes to BBC News articles.
I’m sure that’s the last we will hear of that matter then 😉
It would be embarrassing if she’s forced to resign for a second time in six months for breaching the code.
Will Sunak go full nuts and place Patel back in the job…still time for her to get sacked again too.
I’m interested to hear whether Braverman considers this kind of behaviour fits in with her much vaunted “British values” or not.
There are now 2 issues, neither of which are addressed.
1. The involvement of civil servants in this, which was serious enough that they complained.
2. Her office denying that the speeding offence had happened, and instructing her publically funded spads to lie to the press.
Both are resigning offences.
She wants the Tories to lose as badly as possible so that she can have a shot at the leadership.
Minister notorious for breaking ministerial rules is sure she didn’t break ministerial rules when involving the civil service in assisting with personal matters.
She really is a piece of shit. She’s the shit cherry on top of the shit cake.
The kicker is, if she just took it on the chin and did it, it would be a complete nothing story.
Isn’t this worded very similarly to Boris’ “I’ve been advised they weren’t parties” defence?
It’s trying to sidestep the issue that – in the Boris case – *he was fucking there*.
And in this case, it’s not denying that she asked the civil service to intervene, but that she’s ‘confident nothing untoward happened’
But, hey, it’s par for course with the current party…
When did the ‘honourable resignation’ become so optional?
I remember Lord Carrington resigning as Foreign Sec. for not spotting that the Argentines were serious about claiming the Falklands. If I remember correctly Thatcher was relutant to accept his resignation.
Patel did not resign when caught out operating her own foreign policy visit to Israel behind Prime Minister May’s back, she had to be sacked.
Was it Johnson who just decided to toss the rules in the bin? Yet he himself resigned..
She was attempting to abuse her position and power to imtimidate civil servants for preferential treatment. Thatsaclear fact. It depends how seriously you view it, I guess.
Even Simon Jenkins of the Guardian thinks this is a trivial storm in a teacup, blown out of all proportion.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/22/westminster-suella-braverman-speeding-home-secretary
Isn’t it time we deported this criminal to Rwanada?
she’ll get sacked for this sooner or later but I am so worn down I dont care.
a speeding ticket? there sewage in rivers. lawless cities and failing infrastructure. who cares?
I am really sick of this country and the absolute cunts we call a government
It’s all beyond a joke and it seems to get worse every day
I really don’t understand why this is such a big deal
I detest her. However, I don’t think the original thing is that bad at all.
Lying about it sure is though
We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong, as detailed in this report that we’re definitely going to release to the public as soon as I’ve dealt with this massive pile of paperwork. Oh and then we have that thing, you know the one. I might have to push it to next year but then we’ll definitely release it, unless the printer has jammed again.
Yes, she didn’t commit a serious offence like holding up a sign or carrying a rape alarm.
I’m confident Suella Braverman is a vicious righty bitch who I wouldn’t trust to watch a puppy for 5 minutes in case she tries to dagger its guts open