That seems good? As in, these tenants now have rental security for life, and the state still owns the homes afterwards. Otherwise a decent portion of these would have been turned into single-family homes.
The article says nothing about the ethical problem of this when it should clearly be illegal, no one being named, just straight up, the problem is being made worse and there’s nothing anyone can do.
The housing crisis must be such a hilarious joke to these British tabloid scumbags.
3 comments
Absolutely ridiculous.
That seems good? As in, these tenants now have rental security for life, and the state still owns the homes afterwards. Otherwise a decent portion of these would have been turned into single-family homes.
The article says nothing about the ethical problem of this when it should clearly be illegal, no one being named, just straight up, the problem is being made worse and there’s nothing anyone can do.
The housing crisis must be such a hilarious joke to these British tabloid scumbags.