I really wish the media would write a little more clearly on topics like this:
> “You can use AI today to create new recipes for bio weapons or to launch large-scale cyber attacks. These are bad things.
The headline is written such that AI would go all Skynet / Ultron on us and start wiping people out independently.
That they’re really worried about is AI being used to push advancements in weaponry / applications that could be used *by people* to harm humanity.
It’s a reasonable fear, written about badly.
This is why I always say please and thank you when speaking with Alexa.
Honestly, the people creating AI are fucking tapped.
The government really doesn’t want to admit the biggest immediate threat is the loss of income, of course that would mean some wokerati policy is needed to address it.
“could”
As in “I could give Margot Robbie the night of her life”
Already happening with drones in Ukraine. Also how do I become no10 adviser?
You can do that with any technology, after all, how long ago was the first atomic bomb?
It’s still requiring someone to decide to use technology to develop in that way.
The debate on AI seems to be getting more stupid by the day. Ironically you would have a better informed debate if they just asked ChatGPT rather than some No10 advisor. I think that is probably what they are most worried about.
It’s always amusing to watch the public panic about something they have absolutely no idea about and suddenly have strong opinions on said thing they know nothing about beyond the name of it.
Well.
I’ll just
Praise the Omnissiah then and all will be good.
These people are so terminally stupid I’m amazed they manage to tie their shoelaces in the morning.
Total alarmist drivel.
No, you can’t get it to tell you the recipe for a bioweapon. You can ask it, but it’s going to give you an answer that _sounds_ good (which is all it has ever been able to do).
I do hope this occurs after the Brexit dividend gets paid out and pigs roam the British skies. I am looking forward to both events /s.
More cynically AI is already deadly, in the form of TikTok recommendation algorithms that drive people to suicide.
I’m completely over the idea of politicians and their advisors weighing in on this. There is a global race here that will not end until such time as one play becomes dominant and has a runaway AGI.
All this talk of “could” and “might” is irrelevant. As is the “way too late to the party” intent to regulate.
As ever, our backwards political class are so far behind they’ll never catch up and what will be, will be.
This is so ridiculous. I guess the people with the AI realise they need a barrier to entry to stop myriad others simply recreating what they have and making it worth nothing. There’s no better barrier to entry than Government red tape.
This is to stop you developing AI, not them.
The sad thing is Governments are going to fall for this scaremongering crap. It’s not even the usual “5 years” they put on these dumb stories. Now it’s just 2 years.
But but i can now create pretty pictures for my Instagram so is good !
A lot of early religious beliefs centered around sun worship. Would be crazy if in the past we got enslaved by AI/Robots and a sunflare destoyed them leading to us worshipping it.
Chat-gpt is just a language model, it is not self aware and can’t think. We are years away from achieveing AGI.
This is just sensationilist bullshit for clicks.
his reads like a Daily Mail/Express headline
AI isn’t even sentient yet.
On an unrelated note, anyone played the new System Shock reboot?
Seriously? This is the future I gotta look forward to?
I’ve literally just been made the lead researcher for the implementation of AI at my job, half the people are excited about how we can use it as a tool and the other half think we’re all going to be destroyed.
Good. Let it start with the politicians and the No10 advisers.
23 comments
I really wish the media would write a little more clearly on topics like this:
> “You can use AI today to create new recipes for bio weapons or to launch large-scale cyber attacks. These are bad things.
The headline is written such that AI would go all Skynet / Ultron on us and start wiping people out independently.
That they’re really worried about is AI being used to push advancements in weaponry / applications that could be used *by people* to harm humanity.
It’s a reasonable fear, written about badly.
This is why I always say please and thank you when speaking with Alexa.
Honestly, the people creating AI are fucking tapped.
The government really doesn’t want to admit the biggest immediate threat is the loss of income, of course that would mean some wokerati policy is needed to address it.
“could”
As in “I could give Margot Robbie the night of her life”
Already happening with drones in Ukraine. Also how do I become no10 adviser?
Starting with [those](https://www.foxnews.com/tech/us-military-ai-drone-simulation-kills-operator-told-bad-takes-out-control-tower) holding the stick.
You can do that with any technology, after all, how long ago was the first atomic bomb?
It’s still requiring someone to decide to use technology to develop in that way.
The debate on AI seems to be getting more stupid by the day. Ironically you would have a better informed debate if they just asked ChatGPT rather than some No10 advisor. I think that is probably what they are most worried about.
It’s always amusing to watch the public panic about something they have absolutely no idea about and suddenly have strong opinions on said thing they know nothing about beyond the name of it.
Well.
I’ll just
Praise the Omnissiah then and all will be good.
These people are so terminally stupid I’m amazed they manage to tie their shoelaces in the morning.
Total alarmist drivel.
No, you can’t get it to tell you the recipe for a bioweapon. You can ask it, but it’s going to give you an answer that _sounds_ good (which is all it has ever been able to do).
I do hope this occurs after the Brexit dividend gets paid out and pigs roam the British skies. I am looking forward to both events /s.
More cynically AI is already deadly, in the form of TikTok recommendation algorithms that drive people to suicide.
I’m completely over the idea of politicians and their advisors weighing in on this. There is a global race here that will not end until such time as one play becomes dominant and has a runaway AGI.
All this talk of “could” and “might” is irrelevant. As is the “way too late to the party” intent to regulate.
As ever, our backwards political class are so far behind they’ll never catch up and what will be, will be.
This is so ridiculous. I guess the people with the AI realise they need a barrier to entry to stop myriad others simply recreating what they have and making it worth nothing. There’s no better barrier to entry than Government red tape.
This is to stop you developing AI, not them.
The sad thing is Governments are going to fall for this scaremongering crap. It’s not even the usual “5 years” they put on these dumb stories. Now it’s just 2 years.
But but i can now create pretty pictures for my Instagram so is good !
A lot of early religious beliefs centered around sun worship. Would be crazy if in the past we got enslaved by AI/Robots and a sunflare destoyed them leading to us worshipping it.
Chat-gpt is just a language model, it is not self aware and can’t think. We are years away from achieveing AGI.
This is just sensationilist bullshit for clicks.
his reads like a Daily Mail/Express headline
AI isn’t even sentient yet.
On an unrelated note, anyone played the new System Shock reboot?
Seriously? This is the future I gotta look forward to?
I’ve literally just been made the lead researcher for the implementation of AI at my job, half the people are excited about how we can use it as a tool and the other half think we’re all going to be destroyed.
Good. Let it start with the politicians and the No10 advisers.