> Having reportedly made the BBC aware of their concerns on 19 May, the family said they became frustrated when the presenter remained on air and they then decided to approach the Sun.
I’d have thought the police would be high up on the list of places to try. Speaking to an employer about what someone does in their private life seems a strange way of dealing with the situation.
Let me check I have this right :
The sun newspaper, which for 45 years paid 17yo girls to bare their tits on page 3 is OUTRAGED that a 17 year old was paid for explicit pictures.
I’ve probably only got a snippet of info on this, but unnamed presenter legally paid lots of money for nudes.
Nude person spent all their money on crack, and now it’s a big scandal because the family claim she wouldn’t have bought crack if she didn’t get big money from said presenter?
I don’t get what the scandal is?
Yes, said presenter is a bit of a deviant and paid for nudes like an idiot, but it’s not their fault the person spent their money on a drug addiction!
Why is this even the BBC’s business apart from them employing this person? Did any of it happen on BBC grounds?
ITV apparently knew all about the Schofield business and protected him and tolerated all the toxicity etc but now because it’s the BBC the media turn on them. And the Sun, no less. Has the BBC actually seen proof that it’s true?
4 comments
> Having reportedly made the BBC aware of their concerns on 19 May, the family said they became frustrated when the presenter remained on air and they then decided to approach the Sun.
I’d have thought the police would be high up on the list of places to try. Speaking to an employer about what someone does in their private life seems a strange way of dealing with the situation.
Let me check I have this right :
The sun newspaper, which for 45 years paid 17yo girls to bare their tits on page 3 is OUTRAGED that a 17 year old was paid for explicit pictures.
I’ve probably only got a snippet of info on this, but unnamed presenter legally paid lots of money for nudes.
Nude person spent all their money on crack, and now it’s a big scandal because the family claim she wouldn’t have bought crack if she didn’t get big money from said presenter?
I don’t get what the scandal is?
Yes, said presenter is a bit of a deviant and paid for nudes like an idiot, but it’s not their fault the person spent their money on a drug addiction!
Why is this even the BBC’s business apart from them employing this person? Did any of it happen on BBC grounds?
ITV apparently knew all about the Schofield business and protected him and tolerated all the toxicity etc but now because it’s the BBC the media turn on them. And the Sun, no less. Has the BBC actually seen proof that it’s true?