Another classic case of “he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said”.
They may not be able to prove he broke any laws, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t a sleazy scumbag that dozens of women felt harassed or grossed out by. Even if he’s not a criminal, maybe other actors and directors just don’t want to work with a handsy creep.
He is a total narcissist. He wouldn’t have even earnt the figure he’s asking for, he wasn’t a well known actor. What a victim.
Bold strategy Cotton, let’s see if it pays off for him
How does the law view this? Couldn’t the guardian argue that they were simply telling the stories of these women. It’s not the guardians own words. They are just reporting on what other people are saying right?
£10 million, fml people are so entitled.
He does know that a large percentage of people in this country barely make £1.5 million…………… in their entire lives right? Silly money.
If he wasn’t prosecuted then the Guardian shouldn’t have published the stories in which he’s purported to have commited crimes.
Liking or disliking is him is irrelevant, stories of his surpossed behaviour are meaningless.
The Guardian should be fined and more besides.
Defund the Guardian. The Guardian of old is dead. It’s now a shambling zombie spouting clickbait woke nonsense.
7 comments
Another classic case of “he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said”.
They may not be able to prove he broke any laws, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t a sleazy scumbag that dozens of women felt harassed or grossed out by. Even if he’s not a criminal, maybe other actors and directors just don’t want to work with a handsy creep.
He is a total narcissist. He wouldn’t have even earnt the figure he’s asking for, he wasn’t a well known actor. What a victim.
Bold strategy Cotton, let’s see if it pays off for him
How does the law view this? Couldn’t the guardian argue that they were simply telling the stories of these women. It’s not the guardians own words. They are just reporting on what other people are saying right?
£10 million, fml people are so entitled.
He does know that a large percentage of people in this country barely make £1.5 million…………… in their entire lives right? Silly money.
If he wasn’t prosecuted then the Guardian shouldn’t have published the stories in which he’s purported to have commited crimes.
Liking or disliking is him is irrelevant, stories of his surpossed behaviour are meaningless.
The Guardian should be fined and more besides.
Defund the Guardian. The Guardian of old is dead. It’s now a shambling zombie spouting clickbait woke nonsense.