> “no clear, accepted or agreed definition of what living like a man or a woman is”
What is transition then? Seems rather inconsistent reasoning.
*and at the same time they are offering safeguards by saying they could bring prosecutions for fraudulent declarations if they don’t “live in the acquired gender”. How? This is absurdly muddled.
1 comment
> “no clear, accepted or agreed definition of what living like a man or a woman is”
What is transition then? Seems rather inconsistent reasoning.
*and at the same time they are offering safeguards by saying they could bring prosecutions for fraudulent declarations if they don’t “live in the acquired gender”. How? This is absurdly muddled.