Those pesky loony-lefty activist judges, always applying the law wrong.
>In AM’s case the application that the costs payable by the Home Secretary be assessed on the indemnity basis succeeds.
Lol oh dear Suella…
A woman with young children not considering others in the same position.
The tories sure do like breaking the law while expecting everyone else to abide by it.
It’s ironic that so many people who support her cruelty and law breaking refer to refugees as “illegals”.
How long do they intend to keep going on this roundabout?
I don’t understand the people who support this either. The laws are not exactly lenient on things like asylum claims. But you cannot just act illegally when we have a system of rules and laws. Clearly those laws *are* workable, they were capable of deporting tens of thousands of people a year in the 2000s without all this hassle. Our government just keeps choosing to ignore them, and then when it needs to reduce the backlog, because it can’t just deport people unilaterally, instead waves them on through with little to no checks? You couldn’t make this shit up, they do it in plain sight, yet all these anti-immigration, anti-refugee people *support* this? And attack *Labour* as if they’re the ones who were weak on border control… Its so fucking stupid.
>Asylum seekers are not allowed to work for the first year that their claim is being considered and after that only those on the government’s shortage occupation list are allowed to work. Many asylum seekers are entirely dependent on the Home Office for their survival in the form of payments of £45 a week if they are in shared housing or £9.10 a week if they are living in a hotel.
A bit of a distraction from the main point of the article but this timeline should be accelerated. If the asylum system is so broken that a decision cannot be made within a year then the asylum seeker should have the option to work to survive.
I would suggest those on the shortage of occupation list should be able to work within 6 months, everyone else within one year.
I don’t see how it’s within anyone’s interest to deny that.
7 comments
Those pesky loony-lefty activist judges, always applying the law wrong.
>In AM’s case the application that the costs payable by the Home Secretary be assessed on the indemnity basis succeeds.
Lol oh dear Suella…
A woman with young children not considering others in the same position.
The tories sure do like breaking the law while expecting everyone else to abide by it.
It’s ironic that so many people who support her cruelty and law breaking refer to refugees as “illegals”.
How long do they intend to keep going on this roundabout?
I don’t understand the people who support this either. The laws are not exactly lenient on things like asylum claims. But you cannot just act illegally when we have a system of rules and laws. Clearly those laws *are* workable, they were capable of deporting tens of thousands of people a year in the 2000s without all this hassle. Our government just keeps choosing to ignore them, and then when it needs to reduce the backlog, because it can’t just deport people unilaterally, instead waves them on through with little to no checks? You couldn’t make this shit up, they do it in plain sight, yet all these anti-immigration, anti-refugee people *support* this? And attack *Labour* as if they’re the ones who were weak on border control… Its so fucking stupid.
>Asylum seekers are not allowed to work for the first year that their claim is being considered and after that only those on the government’s shortage occupation list are allowed to work. Many asylum seekers are entirely dependent on the Home Office for their survival in the form of payments of £45 a week if they are in shared housing or £9.10 a week if they are living in a hotel.
A bit of a distraction from the main point of the article but this timeline should be accelerated. If the asylum system is so broken that a decision cannot be made within a year then the asylum seeker should have the option to work to survive.
I would suggest those on the shortage of occupation list should be able to work within 6 months, everyone else within one year.
I don’t see how it’s within anyone’s interest to deny that.