Quite interesting that from 10% to 90% percentile pp and psoe have equal share of votes, the difference is only in 10% richest and 10% poorest voters.
very popular that party 😅
This is what I would have expected. PP gets more votes from the wealthy that want tax cuts and economic stability but are not too radical, as well as social conservatives regardless of wealth. PSOE gets votes from the poorer people due to welfare policies and this gets less as they benefit the rich less and become more of a burden on them. Vox gets votes from poorer because they are more dissatisfied with the current political parties because of their situation, and migrants get the blame alongside the wealthiest who really want lower taxes and see PP as a weaker option. And Sumar attracts a young fairly wealthy demographic that wants more socialism, but keeps away the very poor who turn to Vox and the very wealthy who stand to lose a lot from taxes.
4 comments
Source https://www.eldiario.es/politica/voto-renta-23j-pp-disparo-5-rico_1_10407656.html
Quite interesting that from 10% to 90% percentile pp and psoe have equal share of votes, the difference is only in 10% richest and 10% poorest voters.
very popular that party 😅
This is what I would have expected. PP gets more votes from the wealthy that want tax cuts and economic stability but are not too radical, as well as social conservatives regardless of wealth. PSOE gets votes from the poorer people due to welfare policies and this gets less as they benefit the rich less and become more of a burden on them. Vox gets votes from poorer because they are more dissatisfied with the current political parties because of their situation, and migrants get the blame alongside the wealthiest who really want lower taxes and see PP as a weaker option. And Sumar attracts a young fairly wealthy demographic that wants more socialism, but keeps away the very poor who turn to Vox and the very wealthy who stand to lose a lot from taxes.