Talk of Ukraine Joining NATO in Exchange for Territorial Concessions Is Unacceptable – Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry

by EuropeanPravdaUA

20 comments
  1. Absolutley! They would be abandoning those Ukrainians in the occupied territories.

  2. Who is actually purporting these things? I always see the articles rejecting it, but never a quoted source that names when NATO asks for these things.

  3. Russia will leave every inch of Ukraine. Putin Will be deposed and Ukraine will join NATO.

    It’s all inevitable. Only the timeline e is still undecided.

  4. So dear foreign redditors, still think that West had no plan to sell out Ukraine for cadaver of so called “peace”? I will remind you that it was planed Ben Wallace would replace jens Stoltenberg, but protector of democracy Joe Biden was pissed off by United Kingdom’s too energetic weapon support. Yeah, right, same Joe Biden who signed land-lease and never used it, and had made many-many other things to help ruzians in their invasion.

    What a great plan I must say, with just one flaw. In it’s blind arrogance West will not sell just a part of Ukraine, but would make it possible for ruzia to seize it all.

  5. 100%. Anyone saying they should make concessions should give up 1/2 their house to a thug and then agree the Thug owns that half so long as they can take out private security to stop the thug from for taking more rooms. Can you imagine Stian Jenssen saying it is Ok, Norway will give up Svalbard and Jan Mayen to Russia so long as they don.t hurt us?

  6. Has someone already sent this guy _nahui ?_

    Now…?

    Not yet….?

  7. by now, reasonable people know that UA won’t make any concessions. it’s totally useless to make such proposals or to paint these options as “alternatives”. it’s known for a long time that concessions are no alternative.

    the leaders and elites, especially pro-UA, should already accept it and stop with these periodic attempts to throw them into the open. the only thing that happens is, that UA’s stance on this gets reinforced, time and time again. as is their right. and as it should be. not a single centimeter of UA territory to orks. it’s enough that our society is polarized on the war and there’s lots of kremlin simps, we don’t need to hear it from pro-UA officials, especially from inside NATO.

  8. russia absolutely must be driven out. We owe it to everyone who lives in occupied territory to be liberated from russian theft and torture.

    Any concession of territory would reward russia and give the katsaps more resources with which to continue their efforts corrupting and subverting western democracies.

    Never forget, russia is at war not only with Ukraine but also the free world.

  9. Keep pushing. Someone is throwing out this nonsense for a reason.

  10. Why, I say Ukraine goes into NATO and russia concedes kursk, belgorod and Bryansk oblasts.

    Sounds acceptable to me. Maybe the issue is voroenzh?

  11. Appeasement never works. Learn from history, NATO Leaders
    Appeasement back in 2014 is what led to the events of modern times

  12. That’s like asking the US to make concessions to giving up Alaska and California to the enemy, in order to become a member of or remain part of the UN. It’s absurd and no one would take that seriously.

  13. Ukraine would never leave Mariuple in Russian hands, the world needs to know what happened there. Ukraine won’t rest until they get there.

  14. Until all of the Russians are gone, the war won’t be over.

    How hard is this to comprehend?

  15. I read this as Ukraine should take over Russian territories and give them to NATO in exchange for NATO membership. I was like ok. Then I read the comments and was like oh…. This talking ballsack is suggesting that Ukraine should give up some of it’s territory. Not a chance.

  16. There should absolutely be territorial concessions. In the very least, Ukraine should be given Rostov and then entire Muscovite Black Sea coast, restoring the Ukrainian territories stolen in 1919. Also, Poland and Lithuania can decide who gets Königsberg back, or maybe they can split it?

  17. If you are an organization whose founding principle is territorial integrity, even allowing the idea is a betrayal.

    He should quit or be dismissed

Leave a Reply