The reason they moved to independent legal chairs in the first place was because Chiefs were accused of retaining too many officers following misconduct proceedings. How can having an independent person presiding over these proceedings not be the fairest approach?
1 comment
And I expect we’ll have more stories like this:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-55967508
The reason they moved to independent legal chairs in the first place was because Chiefs were accused of retaining too many officers following misconduct proceedings. How can having an independent person presiding over these proceedings not be the fairest approach?