Home Office defies high court by placing 100 asylum-seeker children in hotels

by rejs7

5 comments
  1. As said in another sub in this topic, but this is just horrific behaviour by the Home Secretary, she is currently actively and knowingly putting children at risk.

  2. I have a few questions.

    Are they with families? Or are they alone. Why do they not have an appointed gurdian?

    Is there no staff?

    Were else should they go? Is there not a foster system or group home for orphans?

    Edit) better phrased question.

  3. They’re 16 and 17 year olds (if not adults) and have trekked all the way across Europe and further. I’m sure they’ll be fine in a British hotel for a while. It’s not as if they can conjure up more foster homes out of thin air.

  4. My nephew went into a childrens home for a bit, long story.

    Anyway, it was 250 miles away from his mum.

    We are not flush with childrens homes, is what I am saying.

    What’s the government meant to do here?

    Also, seems these are 16 and 17 year olds. They’ll survive.

    And if these refugee hotels are such perilous places for children, erm.. What does that say about the people we’re letting into our country?

    Also, and this must be factored in… Asylum seekers lie about their age *a lot*.

  5. Braverman should be thrown in the slammer for contempt of court.

Leave a Reply