>Causing a severe radiological accident for strategic purposes is unacceptable. A deliberate aggravation of an emerging nuclear catastrophe—preventing mitigation measures or allowing reactors to deliberately melt down and potentially contaminate wide portions of Europe—would simply be nuclear warfare without bombs.
>Such a scenario can’t be ruled out
Yeah, it can be ruled out as this nonsense scenario is thought up by the borderline deranged author.
> Given Russia’s apparent interest in radiation-spewing nuclear-powered cruise missiles, robotic undersea bombs with a radiological fallout-oriented payload, destructive anti-satellite tests and other nihilistic, world-harming weapons, Russia’s ongoing dalliance with “Gray Zone” warfare in Ukraine may, for the rest of Europe, become a real matter of estimating radiological “grays,” or, in other words, estimating the amount of ionizing radiation absorbed by humans
Russian pursuit of these exotic weapons is a means to hedge against any breakthrough in missile defense. Plain old nuclear weapons are world-harming enough.
Cool, another reason why not to invade a neighbouring country. I mean, if reactors start blowing russia will be the first one affected by it.
That is another good reason for Putin’s hunger for power and war to stop whatever he is doing and retreat. No need for Nuclear disasters because of a crybaby oligarch.
Hey Europe, this fallout will likely fall all over you, maybe dont sell out Ukraine, unless you like playing cancer roulette.
As much I as loved the Chernobyl series I would rather not have a season 2.
“One step further, I’m gonna nuke us all.”
Ukraine gave up its nukes for a piece of paper promising it would never be invaded. A bit ironic its nuclear power plants might prevent it.
8 comments
>Causing a severe radiological accident for strategic purposes is unacceptable. A deliberate aggravation of an emerging nuclear catastrophe—preventing mitigation measures or allowing reactors to deliberately melt down and potentially contaminate wide portions of Europe—would simply be nuclear warfare without bombs.
>Such a scenario can’t be ruled out
Yeah, it can be ruled out as this nonsense scenario is thought up by the borderline deranged author.
> Given Russia’s apparent interest in radiation-spewing nuclear-powered cruise missiles, robotic undersea bombs with a radiological fallout-oriented payload, destructive anti-satellite tests and other nihilistic, world-harming weapons, Russia’s ongoing dalliance with “Gray Zone” warfare in Ukraine may, for the rest of Europe, become a real matter of estimating radiological “grays,” or, in other words, estimating the amount of ionizing radiation absorbed by humans
Russian pursuit of these exotic weapons is a means to hedge against any breakthrough in missile defense. Plain old nuclear weapons are world-harming enough.
Cool, another reason why not to invade a neighbouring country. I mean, if reactors start blowing russia will be the first one affected by it.
That is another good reason for Putin’s hunger for power and war to stop whatever he is doing and retreat. No need for Nuclear disasters because of a crybaby oligarch.
Hey Europe, this fallout will likely fall all over you, maybe dont sell out Ukraine, unless you like playing cancer roulette.
As much I as loved the Chernobyl series I would rather not have a season 2.
“One step further, I’m gonna nuke us all.”
Ukraine gave up its nukes for a piece of paper promising it would never be invaded. A bit ironic its nuclear power plants might prevent it.
Tragedy