I’m confused by how many people seem to think everyone likes the same sex things. “Oh, women love being choked! I seen it on porntube! Imma try that the first time I get to do sex on a woman!”
It makes as much sense as thinking everyone loves chocolate ice-cream with crumble for dessert.
Maybe we really need to get that explicit with sex and relationship education in secondary. “Hey kids! People have really varied tastes when it comes to sex. *Most* people don’t like choking, anal prolapse, or sounding. So it’s a good idea to check before hand! Sex is much better when you are both doing things you enjoy!”
> He explains that once a student has made a complaint, and it has been determined that they do not want to go to the police, the university’s own internal investigation will “gather pace quite quickly”. While a criminal rape investigation often takes years, a university will aim to investigate in a few months.
Don’t people realise how crazy it is for something like this to be occurring?
What qualifies a universities ‘internal investigation team’ to investigate serious crimes?
Why don’t they pour those resources into giving alleged victims support over and above what they will get from the police instead?
Why should any student accept as legitimate the verdict of an opaque body that has no binding commitment to due process?
Keep in mind that the culture from universities creeps into wider society not long after. It seems that in universities and in many other places these days, people have decided that a certain category of crimes, they don’t like the outcomes they get from the justice system so they are creating these parallel systems & panels and deciding that they’ll make their decisions there instead.
We all know what the ideological bent of these panels is likely to be.
2 comments
I’m confused by how many people seem to think everyone likes the same sex things. “Oh, women love being choked! I seen it on porntube! Imma try that the first time I get to do sex on a woman!”
It makes as much sense as thinking everyone loves chocolate ice-cream with crumble for dessert.
Maybe we really need to get that explicit with sex and relationship education in secondary. “Hey kids! People have really varied tastes when it comes to sex. *Most* people don’t like choking, anal prolapse, or sounding. So it’s a good idea to check before hand! Sex is much better when you are both doing things you enjoy!”
> He explains that once a student has made a complaint, and it has been determined that they do not want to go to the police, the university’s own internal investigation will “gather pace quite quickly”. While a criminal rape investigation often takes years, a university will aim to investigate in a few months.
Don’t people realise how crazy it is for something like this to be occurring?
What qualifies a universities ‘internal investigation team’ to investigate serious crimes?
Why don’t they pour those resources into giving alleged victims support over and above what they will get from the police instead?
Why should any student accept as legitimate the verdict of an opaque body that has no binding commitment to due process?
Keep in mind that the culture from universities creeps into wider society not long after. It seems that in universities and in many other places these days, people have decided that a certain category of crimes, they don’t like the outcomes they get from the justice system so they are creating these parallel systems & panels and deciding that they’ll make their decisions there instead.
We all know what the ideological bent of these panels is likely to be.