Wow, so a bed for a night in a hostel and a bit of food, he must be really living the life.
At least he can breach his court order and get a bed for free, that’ll teach him…
Could they also ban advertising? It’s like big corporations can “beg” people for money (and using manipulative language at that), but if regular folks do it, suddenly it’s wrong?
“Police said people in Lincoln would “feel more relaxed” that Chambers was not allowed to ask them for money.”
Wow. Have some fucking perspective.
The fact that we’re meant to be outraged by a homeless person daring to earn *a whole 60 pounds a day* for a room and food when the Lettuce Prime Minister and her chancellor literally tanked the pound on purpose so that all their mates could short it for god knows how many millions of pounds…
Not to mention all the billions being given to the Tory corporate mates.
Rollbacks on environmental pledges.
*Our rivers being filled with literal shit…*
I can’t even be bothered to add to this list. Feel free if you want to.
But nah mate. You’re supposed to be angry at this. Oh, and people on benefits having a phone.
I hate the phrase “up to” in situations like this. It means that’s the maximum he can earn in a day, when the average would be a more meaningful number.
It’s a way to make it sound like he earns more than he does.
Wheras working 8 hours at **minimum wage** would snag you about £80 which, I’ll remind you, is what the Government says is the minimum you need to make to live.
The real villains are at the top and they want you to be mad at the people below you.
Real question, is there any circumstance where a homeless person would be refused at say, the Salvation Army or other shelters?
Now if only they could do something about all the fake beggars I see in town.
8 comments
Up to £60!
Wow, so a bed for a night in a hostel and a bit of food, he must be really living the life.
At least he can breach his court order and get a bed for free, that’ll teach him…
Could they also ban advertising? It’s like big corporations can “beg” people for money (and using manipulative language at that), but if regular folks do it, suddenly it’s wrong?
“Police said people in Lincoln would “feel more relaxed” that Chambers was not allowed to ask them for money.”
Wow. Have some fucking perspective.
The fact that we’re meant to be outraged by a homeless person daring to earn *a whole 60 pounds a day* for a room and food when the Lettuce Prime Minister and her chancellor literally tanked the pound on purpose so that all their mates could short it for god knows how many millions of pounds…
Not to mention all the billions being given to the Tory corporate mates.
Rollbacks on environmental pledges.
*Our rivers being filled with literal shit…*
I can’t even be bothered to add to this list. Feel free if you want to.
But nah mate. You’re supposed to be angry at this. Oh, and people on benefits having a phone.
I hate the phrase “up to” in situations like this. It means that’s the maximum he can earn in a day, when the average would be a more meaningful number.
It’s a way to make it sound like he earns more than he does.
Wheras working 8 hours at **minimum wage** would snag you about £80 which, I’ll remind you, is what the Government says is the minimum you need to make to live.
The real villains are at the top and they want you to be mad at the people below you.
Real question, is there any circumstance where a homeless person would be refused at say, the Salvation Army or other shelters?
Now if only they could do something about all the fake beggars I see in town.