Given the news lately, it’s wild that this is the best outcome.
Defenders will still act like these murder machines are innocent and sweet.
Am I right in thinking that these are two separate incidents?
“Gaynor lost her thumb when the Piglet snapped at her earlier this month – and she then watched in horror as the deranged hound swallowed it.”
So the dog bit off and ate her thumb, then a month later attacked the husband? And they fucking kept it around the house? Are people seriously this dumb?? Jesus fucking christ.
It’s as if it was specifically bred to fuck up larger prey and not to give up until it was dead.
All dogs bred for fighting and any sub breeds should be banned. Muzzles,mandatory spay/neutering, colossal fines.
All dogs have behaviour bred into them. Border collies want to herd. Retrievers want to retrieve. Bloodhounds want to follow a scent.
And fighting dogs want to fight to the death.
“It’s the owner not the dog”
Yes any dog can turn. But if a chihuahua or a yorkie turns aggressive you can kick it way easily. Bigger dogs can’t be stopped by a person. This dog was punched 30 times by a fully grown man and it still wouldn’t stop.
That’s why dogs like this need to be banned.
The aggression has been deliberately bred into them, and when they do turn violent there’s fuck all a person can do to stop it.
“I couldn’t believe it as she was a lovely dog but had got a little bit aggressive in recent weeks.”
Ah yes, lets ignore the warning signs and just keep the dog then. Its even blood related now its eaten your thumb.
Its incidents like these that still have me struggling to tell how much an owner and training can influence these dogs behaviour, because these people are clearly idiots and I doubt will have read up how to train a dog or gotten any advice beyond asking “Big Bazza” down the pub how he stops his Bully ingesting the family.
At the same time, I can see at least one of the attacks in recent times were by one of these dogs that has been trained, but the breed is just on a behavioural knife edge constantly… waiting for the slightest input to push them into toddler dining mode.
>XL Bully owner told how the dog bit off her thumb and ate it
>
>The beast then inflicted 19 bite injuries on hubby George, 63, days later.
>
>And the three-year-old terror also targeted a pal of the couple’s in between those attacks – leaving him with serious leg wounds requiring surgery.
Wait so the dog bit your thumb off, ate it, then mauled a friend before attacking the husband over the course of several days? The dog should have been destroyed straight away after the first incident. By not doing so they knowingly put other people in danger.
These people don’t deserve sympathy they should be in prison.
Can you mauling fetishists go create your own subreddit instead of cluttering up this one? Or make megathread and put it all in there?
They’ve already announced a ban (which is totally unecessary as pitbull mixes are already banned anyway).
You don’t get sympathy when you invite a bear to live in your home.
The best way to stop a dog is to choke it until it blacks out or dies.
These two have got a couple of absolutely brilliant compo faces on them.
I get the arugement about “Oh, it’s the owners”, yes you can train an animal from a pup to be docile and sweet.
But you have a shitload of aggressive genetics to content with here, these dogs are bred to be vicious, if they grab onto something the only way you are getting it off is either incapaciting the dog (VERY hard), putting it down or losing the limb that it’s attached to. If you are not the alpha keeping it in line, it’s going to take control and it’s instinct is “kill”.
These people are not ready for these dogs and unfortunately that puts others at risk. I hate the idea of banning but I cannot rationalise it when there have been *so many* incidents of people getting mauled or even killed lately.
I don’t know why this small woman thought getting the biggest, strongest and most aggressive breed of dog out there was a snsible choice but I guess she learnt her lesson now and has (or hasn’t) a nice reminder of it.
It bit off her thumb in an unprovoked attack and she was like “It’s just a nanny dog, it didn’t mean it…”
Then the dog attacked a friend and mutilated him and they still didn’t kill it.
Then it mutilated the husband and they still didn’t kill it.
THEN when the police got involved they agreed to have the dog killed.
​
This is the sort of person who wants to own these dogs.
They’re fuckwits but fair play to the bloke, being able to punch anything 30 times when you’re 63 years old and look like a bag of sad ham is quite impressive.
> Despite their trauma, they don’t believe the breed should be banned – a move being pushed by PM Rishi Sunak.
> George added: “Not every dog can be lumped in together. They’re not all bad. This shows things can happen out of the blue.”
How fucking thick can you get? It’s *because* these maulings and kills happen out of the blue that they need to be banned. They are unpredictably deadly.
15 comments
Given the news lately, it’s wild that this is the best outcome.
Defenders will still act like these murder machines are innocent and sweet.
Am I right in thinking that these are two separate incidents?
“Gaynor lost her thumb when the Piglet snapped at her earlier this month – and she then watched in horror as the deranged hound swallowed it.”
So the dog bit off and ate her thumb, then a month later attacked the husband? And they fucking kept it around the house? Are people seriously this dumb?? Jesus fucking christ.
It’s as if it was specifically bred to fuck up larger prey and not to give up until it was dead.
All dogs bred for fighting and any sub breeds should be banned. Muzzles,mandatory spay/neutering, colossal fines.
All dogs have behaviour bred into them. Border collies want to herd. Retrievers want to retrieve. Bloodhounds want to follow a scent.
And fighting dogs want to fight to the death.
“It’s the owner not the dog”
Yes any dog can turn. But if a chihuahua or a yorkie turns aggressive you can kick it way easily. Bigger dogs can’t be stopped by a person. This dog was punched 30 times by a fully grown man and it still wouldn’t stop.
That’s why dogs like this need to be banned.
The aggression has been deliberately bred into them, and when they do turn violent there’s fuck all a person can do to stop it.
“I couldn’t believe it as she was a lovely dog but had got a little bit aggressive in recent weeks.”
Ah yes, lets ignore the warning signs and just keep the dog then. Its even blood related now its eaten your thumb.
Its incidents like these that still have me struggling to tell how much an owner and training can influence these dogs behaviour, because these people are clearly idiots and I doubt will have read up how to train a dog or gotten any advice beyond asking “Big Bazza” down the pub how he stops his Bully ingesting the family.
At the same time, I can see at least one of the attacks in recent times were by one of these dogs that has been trained, but the breed is just on a behavioural knife edge constantly… waiting for the slightest input to push them into toddler dining mode.
>XL Bully owner told how the dog bit off her thumb and ate it
>
>The beast then inflicted 19 bite injuries on hubby George, 63, days later.
>
>And the three-year-old terror also targeted a pal of the couple’s in between those attacks – leaving him with serious leg wounds requiring surgery.
Wait so the dog bit your thumb off, ate it, then mauled a friend before attacking the husband over the course of several days? The dog should have been destroyed straight away after the first incident. By not doing so they knowingly put other people in danger.
These people don’t deserve sympathy they should be in prison.
Can you mauling fetishists go create your own subreddit instead of cluttering up this one? Or make megathread and put it all in there?
They’ve already announced a ban (which is totally unecessary as pitbull mixes are already banned anyway).
You don’t get sympathy when you invite a bear to live in your home.
The best way to stop a dog is to choke it until it blacks out or dies.
These two have got a couple of absolutely brilliant compo faces on them.
[Link1](https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/09/dog-attack-george-gaynor-kerr-848017490.jpg?w=620) [Link2](https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/09/dog-attack-george-gaynor-kerr-848017372.jpg?w=620)
I get the arugement about “Oh, it’s the owners”, yes you can train an animal from a pup to be docile and sweet.
But you have a shitload of aggressive genetics to content with here, these dogs are bred to be vicious, if they grab onto something the only way you are getting it off is either incapaciting the dog (VERY hard), putting it down or losing the limb that it’s attached to. If you are not the alpha keeping it in line, it’s going to take control and it’s instinct is “kill”.
These people are not ready for these dogs and unfortunately that puts others at risk. I hate the idea of banning but I cannot rationalise it when there have been *so many* incidents of people getting mauled or even killed lately.
I don’t know why this small woman thought getting the biggest, strongest and most aggressive breed of dog out there was a snsible choice but I guess she learnt her lesson now and has (or hasn’t) a nice reminder of it.
It bit off her thumb in an unprovoked attack and she was like “It’s just a nanny dog, it didn’t mean it…”
Then the dog attacked a friend and mutilated him and they still didn’t kill it.
Then it mutilated the husband and they still didn’t kill it.
THEN when the police got involved they agreed to have the dog killed.
​
This is the sort of person who wants to own these dogs.
They’re fuckwits but fair play to the bloke, being able to punch anything 30 times when you’re 63 years old and look like a bag of sad ham is quite impressive.
> Despite their trauma, they don’t believe the breed should be banned – a move being pushed by PM Rishi Sunak.
> George added: “Not every dog can be lumped in together. They’re not all bad. This shows things can happen out of the blue.”
How fucking thick can you get? It’s *because* these maulings and kills happen out of the blue that they need to be banned. They are unpredictably deadly.