100 Years of World Cup Hosts

by anna_avian

20 comments
  1. Embarrassing. 2030 should’ve been Uruguay & Argentina; 2034 should’ve been Italy.

  2. This must be the dumbest decision ever made by FIFA.

    I can understand the Portugal/Spain/Morocco common hosting, even if Spain alone could do it but it’s nice to have the world cup in Portugal and Morocco as well and they probably would not be able to host it by themselves.

    But WHY having 3 matchs in 3 different South American countries?? There is absolutely not a single rational explanation about it.

    Unless this is only to give the next one to Saudi Arabia as South America, Europe and Africa couldn’t host it according to the FIFA rules. If South America can’t candidate for the 2034 world cup, why did they accept this shitty proposal from FIFA?

  3. What’s the reason for Mexico getting it 3 times? Seems odd that Mexico of all places has gotten it so many times

  4. Qatar is the biggest shame of all time, corruption for hosting right, treatment of migrant workers, climate impact, and so on..

  5. Already looking forward for 2034 with 12 countries hosting the tournament.

  6. Such a shame it’s been so long since it returned to England/the UK; the home of football. By the time we get to host it, it’ll be the 2040s at the earliest I imagine with the Saudi Arabian and Chinese bids for 2034 and 2038…

  7. F**k the FIFA and especially Gianni Infantino.
    They are so damn corrupt and are destroying the sport.

  8. Wrong flag for GB.
    GB == England.
    🇬🇧== 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

  9. GB haven’t ever hosted a World Cup. 1966 was only England (🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿).

  10. The real problem is, there wasn’t even a counter candidate against Infantino.

  11. Well, 2014 was the last one, that wasnt full of shit…

  12. crazy how you could play against your own colony back in the day

  13. Why not North-Korea? They could pay bribes at least in bitcoin

  14. 1966, under the Englsih flag should say: EN not GB as the games only took place in England

Leave a Reply