The article started promising, but around the middle it really lost all focus and never managed to make its titular point. Instead, it somewhat tried to argue that the railroads should become better, but without operational disruptions during the upgrade phase?
If your solution is “we should build entirely new railway tracks and stations next to the existing infrastructure and then switch over when everything is completely ready”, you can just out and say it. It’s not even that crazy an idea, if you are willing to fund it.
1 comment
The article started promising, but around the middle it really lost all focus and never managed to make its titular point. Instead, it somewhat tried to argue that the railroads should become better, but without operational disruptions during the upgrade phase?
If your solution is “we should build entirely new railway tracks and stations next to the existing infrastructure and then switch over when everything is completely ready”, you can just out and say it. It’s not even that crazy an idea, if you are willing to fund it.