Laut israelischem Militär gibt es bislang keine Beweise für eine Verbindung zwischen Iran und Hamas-Angriff

by s0ngsforthedeaf

23 comments

  1. IDF forgets to follow propaganda line being shilled on its behalf by the west.

    LOL

  2. Biggest BS i ever heard . Hamas wouldnt do anything remotely on this scale without papi iran approval

  3. So they were involved in planning “something” over the past few weeks with Hamas, but there’s no proof it was this attack, which they enthusiastically support.

  4. Key word being yet. If they can’t find the link, they will create one.

  5. Israeli intelligence knew about this attack and slept on it. Time to check what Israeli politicians have stocks in weapons manufacturers.

  6. Strange that WSJ claims they spent weeks planning the attacks with Iran while Israeli Army says this

  7. This has Putin fingerprints all over it in one way or another. He knows if he can create conflicts elsewhere his army can buy time in Ukraine.

  8. Well obviously, it takes time to investigate a major terrorist attack.

  9. Maybe this is Israel not wanting to add more fuel to the fire. If there is not obvious evidence they can complete their missions in Gaza while not turning into a multi nation war.

  10. Meaning they have it, but won’t commit to another front just yet.

    Edit; forgot people have no idea how war works. The US has been sharing info with Israel on this for years. If you’d paid attention to any headlines over the past several years maybe you’d know what the hell is going on but that would require actual reading

  11. Sounds like the Israeli military needs to log into Reddit and read the expert reports by random members of the public in r/worldnews who know Iran, Russia and China are behind it.

  12. The fact that even Israel is directly saying they have no evidence for Iranian involvement is a big deal. Obviously these governments need to worry about massive political implications and the intel verification process is complex, but damn.

    WSJ on the fucking hot seat right now. WSJ also happens to have a massive Jewish-American audience being based in NYC and the paper is hugely influential overall.

    Free press yada yada, but given global tensions and various political processes taking place, this seems like irresponsible journalism to me. It seems like a call to arms by WSJ which is certainly not their job.

  13. I do believe Israeli military’s current conclusion to be a honest one. I mean, considering how big this blunder is, Israeli defence apparatus (from intelligence to military) has every reason to try to say Hamas received a lot of help in training and covering up their training. Instead, they would rather pick an embarrassing answer that Hamas, as far as they know, planned this attack without Iranian direct help. This seems to me a sign of honesty.

  14. What? but reddit told me iran and Russia are 100% responsible

  15. Why would Iran not have shared their drone technology with Hamas ?

  17. Maybe Israel just doesn’t want Iran on high alert and upping their military readiness with public acknowledgment of their involvement. Almost zero chance Iran has their hands clean in this.

  18. Israel are playing their cards to their chest. I wonder, how does it immediately benefit Israel to say Iran had nothing to do with this? Maybe it keeps the conflict between Israel and hamas and later Israel will deal with Iran.

  19. That’s because there isn’t one. This is all Bibi and Putin. I believe Bibi orchestrated this attack on Israel for the same reason Trump ordered the attack on 1/6….to stay in power.

  20. I would not be surprised if this were a mostly Russian show.

  21. Hard to situation to call. Israel’s never been against a scuffle with Iran, but I guess that they want to deal with the HAMAS conflict first before they go back to calling out the Persians.

Leave a Reply