does it dramatically decrease the chance of further exchanges of this type? also yes
I thought Qatar was buddy buddy with Iran
Well, that’s not going to be great for the next group of people taken hostage.
**U.S.:** No evidence Iran was involved with Hamas attack.
**Also U.S.:** But we are gonna renege on the deal and hold the money.
I never thought we should have released $6B in the first place, but something doesn’t add up here. Why back out now if they weren’t involved? (And yes, I know they were involved, but how do we explain this move?)
9 comments
does it make sense? yes
does it dramatically decrease the chance of further exchanges of this type? also yes
I thought Qatar was buddy buddy with Iran
Well, that’s not going to be great for the next group of people taken hostage.
**U.S.:** No evidence Iran was involved with Hamas attack.
**Also U.S.:** But we are gonna renege on the deal and hold the money.
I never thought we should have released $6B in the first place, but something doesn’t add up here. Why back out now if they weren’t involved? (And yes, I know they were involved, but how do we explain this move?)
[No Paywall Version btw…](https://archive.md/uCNrm)
Bait and switch, classic deal making
Awkward
send that 6 bill to Ukraine
Maybe they can say they thought it was in Zimbabwe dollars. That is safe to give them.
bad move, now future deals like the release of US prisoners will never happen.