Russia, China, Britain, U.S. and France say no one can win nuclear war

33 comments
  1. This does not have to be the case in a few years. The USA is going to lose most of its deterrence capacity in the next few years. Minutemans will be 50 years old when replaced, Ohio submarines 40+ years old when first Columbia commissioned. Would be a miracle if those missiles lift off when shit happens. Can be the reason why the west is so desperate to negotiate disarmament.

    [“Thinking Again about the Unthinkable” with Dr. Peter Vincent Pry](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K44EPQo-ftg)

  2. Not all Russians agree. [From this excellent article.](https://en.desk-russie.eu/2021/12/30/what-does-the-russian-ultimatum.html)

    >Let’s go back to the analysis of military expert Konstantin Sivkov quoted above: since Russian conventional forces are insufficient, “we can solve the problem of neutralizing Europe and the United States only by physically eliminating them with our nuclear potential… The US and Europe will physically disappear. There will be almost no survivors. But we too will be destroyed. Unless the fate of Russia is better, because we have a large territory. Our opponents will not be able to destroy everything with nuclear strikes. Therefore, the percentage of the surviving population will be higher. However, Russia as a state may disappear after a large-scale nuclear war. It may fragment.”

  3. So…this feels like the war in Ukraine is all but certain. They are calming global tensions around nuclear weapons prior to the expected fight.

    They have no reason to issue such a statement unless they suspect the possibility of conflict happening soon between nuclear armed nations.

  4. I thought we all already came to that conclusion during the Cold War. But still good to see that all still hold this belief I guess.

  5. “Only loosers would not win a nuclear war. I am the best at nuclear wars. Everybody is saying it. I would win it and make the other countries pay for it. It would be so great and people would be talking for years about how great my nuclear war is. etc…” – take a wild guess who would say this….

  6. It’s not about winning. It’s about who goes to the Paradise (Putin) and who just dies (the rest of the world).

  7. The Russian government making a statement like this could be interpreted as foreboding considering the timing, especially given the money they’ve spent in the last few years trying to convince the general public that maneuverable reentry vehicles somehow gives them an advantage in a MAD scenario.

    It gives the impression they’re trying to reassure the Russian people that whatever conflict they start in the near future will not escalate so far as to result in total annihilation.

    More likely though it’s just setting the stage for a bitchfit if/when we deploy conventionally armed land based cruises missiles in Europe following our withdrawal from the INF treaty after decades of Russia shitting all over it.

  8. It is not about winning, it is about making the other side lose… i.e., if my country has already lost, and enemies’ armies are at the gate of my capital, I can make them lose too by using a nuke or two.

    This is the thinking, that each nuclear “power” (looking at you Russia) wants to plant in its opponents’ minds. Don’t fuck with us, even if you win, you also lose.

    MAD – mutual assured destruction is a thing.

  9. If nuclear weapons cease to exist, the lack of a ‘mutually assured destruction’ of the world’s major powers will ensure that WW3 will be inevitable

Leave a Reply