OP context: it is worth noting that *The Hill* tends to have a slight conservative slant to much of their coverage, they are not prone to hyperbolie and are generally considered reliable so far as facts and statements are concerned. The editorials and opinion pieces tend to lean conservative in the traditional sense, but for straightforward news pieces like this they are generally down the middle. *edit: they never jumped on the Trump bandwagon, and keep a distance from the clown caucus*
Multiple outlets had this story Sunday morning (in the US at least), this one has no paywall and is short and to the point.
I have my doubts considering that it was the “sin” of working with the Dems that got the last guy thrown out on his ass. You would need to get some “moderate” republicans to vote against the party line with the Dems to get a speaker in pace that will work for both of them.
Give those dummies thier boarder wall and then get some real work done.
3 comments
OP context: it is worth noting that *The Hill* tends to have a slight conservative slant to much of their coverage, they are not prone to hyperbolie and are generally considered reliable so far as facts and statements are concerned. The editorials and opinion pieces tend to lean conservative in the traditional sense, but for straightforward news pieces like this they are generally down the middle. *edit: they never jumped on the Trump bandwagon, and keep a distance from the clown caucus*
Multiple outlets had this story Sunday morning (in the US at least), this one has no paywall and is short and to the point.
I have my doubts considering that it was the “sin” of working with the Dems that got the last guy thrown out on his ass. You would need to get some “moderate” republicans to vote against the party line with the Dems to get a speaker in pace that will work for both of them.
Give those dummies thier boarder wall and then get some real work done.