Why didn’t they make the map slightly bigger so the Near East and Egypt wouldn’t be so weird?
A busy man.
There are a lot of opponents missing, but this map would become a rainbow I guess.
So few in Spain?
Chart is incomplete af.
just 1 example:
Of Wellingtons 68k army at waterloo there were 17000 dutchmen,3000 from nassau. On top of 11k from hannover and 6k from brunswick.
In fight of Waterloo, Prussia had 48.000 men and England 68.000.
The circle shows a different relation.
It’s cool how you can see he went directly to where the frontier had progressed.
Imagine being a French soldier and going all the way to Egypt in the late1700s/early 1800s to fight the British/Austrians
Austerlitzs placement on the map is wrong.
I miss Bailen
Austrians carrying the war effort and getting smacked left to right only for Britain to claim all the glory.
Love that propaganda about Waterloo being a 75% british and 20ish% prussian fight
12 comments
Why didn’t they make the map slightly bigger so the Near East and Egypt wouldn’t be so weird?
A busy man.
There are a lot of opponents missing, but this map would become a rainbow I guess.
So few in Spain?
Chart is incomplete af.
just 1 example:
Of Wellingtons 68k army at waterloo there were 17000 dutchmen,3000 from nassau. On top of 11k from hannover and 6k from brunswick.
In fight of Waterloo, Prussia had 48.000 men and England 68.000.
The circle shows a different relation.
It’s cool how you can see he went directly to where the frontier had progressed.
Imagine being a French soldier and going all the way to Egypt in the late1700s/early 1800s to fight the British/Austrians
Austerlitzs placement on the map is wrong.
I miss Bailen
Austrians carrying the war effort and getting smacked left to right only for Britain to claim all the glory.
Love that propaganda about Waterloo being a 75% british and 20ish% prussian fight