Fortunately, it occurred to neither organization to combat these illegal IPTV providers by lowering prices. ^^/s
What’s illegal is the price Sky charges people to watch repeat after repeat. The two reasons why I got rid of it!
“At Sky we are passionate about protecting our content while ensuring consumers can enjoy the content they love, free from risks that illegal streams can pose”.
What are these risks?
Sky is the major television company that belongs to FACT. The other is Channel 5. The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 aren’t. So it’s really Sky with help from theor friends at FACT and no doubt City of London Police Intellectual Property Theft that they sponsor. Who are involved.
I get the point of IPTV but I don’t want to pay for piracy. I get that its cheaper than sky and its probably the best way to reliably stream live sport but I pirate shit so I don’t have to pay for it.
I’m not paying an actually company for their services so why would I pay some dodgy bloke with knock off amazon sticks?
I thought FACT had died out along with VHS.. Not heard of them for years!
FACT? The same Federation Against Copyright Theft that was sued for copyright infringement when they included unlicensed music in their own anti-piracy ad back in the day?
Its always a stock photo of a computer (in this case a lappy) with a pirate symbol
They aren’t even using a computer its probably just a sodding fire stick lol
8 comments
Fortunately, it occurred to neither organization to combat these illegal IPTV providers by lowering prices. ^^/s
What’s illegal is the price Sky charges people to watch repeat after repeat. The two reasons why I got rid of it!
“At Sky we are passionate about protecting our content while ensuring consumers can enjoy the content they love, free from risks that illegal streams can pose”.
What are these risks?
Sky is the major television company that belongs to FACT. The other is Channel 5. The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 aren’t. So it’s really Sky with help from theor friends at FACT and no doubt City of London Police Intellectual Property Theft that they sponsor. Who are involved.
I get the point of IPTV but I don’t want to pay for piracy. I get that its cheaper than sky and its probably the best way to reliably stream live sport but I pirate shit so I don’t have to pay for it.
I’m not paying an actually company for their services so why would I pay some dodgy bloke with knock off amazon sticks?
I thought FACT had died out along with VHS.. Not heard of them for years!
FACT? The same Federation Against Copyright Theft that was sued for copyright infringement when they included unlicensed music in their own anti-piracy ad back in the day?
Its always a stock photo of a computer (in this case a lappy) with a pirate symbol
They aren’t even using a computer its probably just a sodding fire stick lol