yeah as if that’s his opinion. The royal vagina expelled man whose fingers are too fat to use a keyboard and would probably not be able to name three social media platforms if pressed. If Sunak thought you pay for fuel with a Coke can(/s), then ol Charlie definitely has no clue.
I fucking knew he was a Redditor.
If he didn’t want to be called a perverted groomer, he shouldn’t have continued to invite a bishop into his family home, after his conviction for gross indecency, to pray with his children.
“why aren’t people more chill?”
asks unfathomably rich man with personal bottom wiper and dedicated armed protection service
Why don’t we just get the speech writers to be king and skip the middle man? A text to speech app could even do the job.
Absolute brain rot in this thread. If he went out tomorrow and said cancer was bad they’d still be people complaining.
‘too often descends’??? He should have said debate often starts with rancour and acrimony and then gets worse
He’s not used to that. In his world everyone is scared to say anything except bowing and scraping.
I won’t have a single bad word said about this great man and his impeccable STATECRAFT!
We’re lucky to have our blue blooded betters. Gawwwwd save the king.
Hey chat GPT:
“write a speech for King Charles about people arguing and being rude on the internet”
[King Charles addresses his subjects]
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Today, I stand before you with a plea for reflection and unity, for it is with a heavy heart that I address a matter that has troubled our realm. In this age of boundless connectivity, we find ourselves navigating a digital realm that can be both a source of great enlightenment and, regrettably, a breeding ground for discord.
The internet, a marvel of our time, has bestowed upon us the power to communicate with the world at the touch of a button. It has connected us across vast distances, transcending borders and time zones, creating bridges between cultures and ideas. It is a tool of immense potential for good.
Yet, as with all great gifts, it is not without its pitfalls. Too often, we witness exchanges tainted by rudeness and incivility. We see arguments waged not in the spirit of seeking understanding, but in the pursuit of proving oneself right. This is a matter of grave concern, for it erodes the very foundations of respectful discourse that our society is built upon.
In these virtual realms, we must remember that behind every screen is a fellow human being, with feelings, dreams, and struggles, just as real as our own. It is far too easy to forget this, to let the anonymity of the digital world obscure our empathy and compassion. Let us not allow this medium to become a shield for incivility.
We are a society bound by values of respect, empathy, and understanding. These are not mere words, but the bedrock of our civilization. It is a testament to our character that we hold ourselves to these standards, both in the tangible world and in the boundless expanse of the internet.
I implore each and every one of you to approach the digital realm with the same courtesy and consideration that you would extend in person. Let us engage in conversations not to win, but to learn and to grow. Let us remember that differing opinions do not make enemies, but rather they enrich our perspectives, fostering growth and progress.
As your king, I am committed to creating an environment where respect and kindness prevail, not only within our physical borders but within the digital landscape as well. I call upon all citizens to stand with me in this endeavor, to be beacons of civility in a world that often lacks it.
Let us be known not only for our achievements but for the respect with which we treat one another, online and offline. Together, we can set an example for the world, proving that it is possible to build a digital realm of discourse that is marked by kindness and understanding.
May we move forward with grace, compassion, and a commitment to unity, so that the legacy we leave for future generations is one of enlightenment, empathy, and enduring harmony.
Thank you, and may our shared journey towards a more compassionate and considerate digital realm be blessed by providence.
I agree jolly old chap, too much skulduggery and tomfoolery for one’s liking.
Well of course it does, just ask about car headlight upgrades. You’ll soon be in a category as bad as Hitler, who used to crop up in any argument, like he did now .
Says the man who said super acrimonious things to his deceased wife
>On social media
I mean, there’s a reason why they needed a law banning the carrying of weapons into the Houses of Parliament. I don’t think the internet has anything to do with it.
There are too many things “debated” on social media that shouldn’t be debated. Some things are objectively true such as the shape of the earth, vaccine efficacy, climate change etc. But people insist that their uneducated opinion counts as much as the empirical data.
Lobbying crime family prefers backroom deals over public debate?
Too much focus is being placed on who is saying it, rather than what he said.
I agree with the points being made. Calm reflection and consideration should always take precedent over knee jerk reactions.
Well if we could actually vote for him then we’d have another outlet to express how he’s the wrong man for the job.
18 comments
yeah as if that’s his opinion. The royal vagina expelled man whose fingers are too fat to use a keyboard and would probably not be able to name three social media platforms if pressed. If Sunak thought you pay for fuel with a Coke can(/s), then ol Charlie definitely has no clue.
I fucking knew he was a Redditor.
If he didn’t want to be called a perverted groomer, he shouldn’t have continued to invite a bishop into his family home, after his conviction for gross indecency, to pray with his children.
“why aren’t people more chill?”
asks unfathomably rich man with personal bottom wiper and dedicated armed protection service
Why don’t we just get the speech writers to be king and skip the middle man? A text to speech app could even do the job.
Absolute brain rot in this thread. If he went out tomorrow and said cancer was bad they’d still be people complaining.
‘too often descends’??? He should have said debate often starts with rancour and acrimony and then gets worse
He’s not used to that. In his world everyone is scared to say anything except bowing and scraping.
I won’t have a single bad word said about this great man and his impeccable STATECRAFT!
We’re lucky to have our blue blooded betters. Gawwwwd save the king.
Hey chat GPT:
“write a speech for King Charles about people arguing and being rude on the internet”
[King Charles addresses his subjects]
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Today, I stand before you with a plea for reflection and unity, for it is with a heavy heart that I address a matter that has troubled our realm. In this age of boundless connectivity, we find ourselves navigating a digital realm that can be both a source of great enlightenment and, regrettably, a breeding ground for discord.
The internet, a marvel of our time, has bestowed upon us the power to communicate with the world at the touch of a button. It has connected us across vast distances, transcending borders and time zones, creating bridges between cultures and ideas. It is a tool of immense potential for good.
Yet, as with all great gifts, it is not without its pitfalls. Too often, we witness exchanges tainted by rudeness and incivility. We see arguments waged not in the spirit of seeking understanding, but in the pursuit of proving oneself right. This is a matter of grave concern, for it erodes the very foundations of respectful discourse that our society is built upon.
In these virtual realms, we must remember that behind every screen is a fellow human being, with feelings, dreams, and struggles, just as real as our own. It is far too easy to forget this, to let the anonymity of the digital world obscure our empathy and compassion. Let us not allow this medium to become a shield for incivility.
We are a society bound by values of respect, empathy, and understanding. These are not mere words, but the bedrock of our civilization. It is a testament to our character that we hold ourselves to these standards, both in the tangible world and in the boundless expanse of the internet.
I implore each and every one of you to approach the digital realm with the same courtesy and consideration that you would extend in person. Let us engage in conversations not to win, but to learn and to grow. Let us remember that differing opinions do not make enemies, but rather they enrich our perspectives, fostering growth and progress.
As your king, I am committed to creating an environment where respect and kindness prevail, not only within our physical borders but within the digital landscape as well. I call upon all citizens to stand with me in this endeavor, to be beacons of civility in a world that often lacks it.
Let us be known not only for our achievements but for the respect with which we treat one another, online and offline. Together, we can set an example for the world, proving that it is possible to build a digital realm of discourse that is marked by kindness and understanding.
May we move forward with grace, compassion, and a commitment to unity, so that the legacy we leave for future generations is one of enlightenment, empathy, and enduring harmony.
Thank you, and may our shared journey towards a more compassionate and considerate digital realm be blessed by providence.
I agree jolly old chap, too much skulduggery and tomfoolery for one’s liking.
Well of course it does, just ask about car headlight upgrades. You’ll soon be in a category as bad as Hitler, who used to crop up in any argument, like he did now .
Says the man who said super acrimonious things to his deceased wife
>On social media
I mean, there’s a reason why they needed a law banning the carrying of weapons into the Houses of Parliament. I don’t think the internet has anything to do with it.
There are too many things “debated” on social media that shouldn’t be debated. Some things are objectively true such as the shape of the earth, vaccine efficacy, climate change etc. But people insist that their uneducated opinion counts as much as the empirical data.
Lobbying crime family prefers backroom deals over public debate?
Too much focus is being placed on who is saying it, rather than what he said.
I agree with the points being made. Calm reflection and consideration should always take precedent over knee jerk reactions.
Well if we could actually vote for him then we’d have another outlet to express how he’s the wrong man for the job.