Guess this is what Russia means when they say they shot down ATACMS 🤷🏽‍♂️

by Super_Camel_3254

14 comments
  1. 3 S400s intercepted them, but there is nuance

    (when they intercept them using the whole truck instead of just the missiles, they become a one-time use thing. Quite an expensive tactic)

  2. 2 ATACMS destroyed (3) 400 installations.
    That’s a value!

  3. Well, technically the S400s *did* destroy the missiles.

  4. Three S-400 less? That’ll make it much easier on the F-16 once they arrive.

  5. Multiple S-400 installations? Holy shit, I hope this is confirmed by other sources soon

  6. What’s sad is they should absolutely be able to intercept 90s missile tech

  7. If true that would obviously answer the question as to whether the S-400 is ABM capable as claimed, but I would take this with a pinch of salt until confirmed by something

  8. Expect more of this – all groundwork for the new air assets that will soon roam the sky.

Leave a Reply