Did the attackers shout “this is jew country” as well?
I do love the term ‘alleged’ thrown into headlines for attacks on mosques yet ‘it most definitely was an attack on the Jewish community without a shadow of a doubt’ headlines.
Sadly it highlights the inconsistency in reporting these incidents accurately and with impartiality , and I genuinely don’t know what can be done about it.
Note: this news article imo reported this correctly : namely it is alleged UNTIL it is confirmed.
This is horrific. People deserve to feel safe in their places of worship, and if the perpetrator is Jewish, they theyre an absolute Shande.
> Alleged ‘attack’
Putting the word attack in quote marks seems a bit over the top when the headline already starts with “alleged”.
It’s not an alleged “attack”, it’s an alleged attack. If the allegations are true then it’s definitely an attack and a racially motivated hate crime.
This tone, and so much of the discourse from the government and the right wing media seems to be telling people that if their skin is a bit darker then any attack on them isn’t really as serious. And even if it is, they probably deserve it because someone else somewhere in the world also had dark skin and did something wrong so they deserve some kind of collective punishment.
they will get a new free top of the range security system fitted at taxpayers expense ,,,allegedly,,,
they will get a new free top of the range security system fitted at taxpayers expense ,,,allegedly,,,
Your third paragraph is confusing and somewhat bizarre, not sure how any of that reflects reality in any way. I’m guessing it indicates your perception of the world around you but to the rest of us it comes across as odd to put it very politely and unhinged ramblings to put it less politely.
It could certainly be considered a hate crime but presumably it would be based on faith/religion and not race/ethnicity.
So did it happen? I’m confused, do we have some proof of it actually happening? I presume they have CCTV round the mosque? Can we get the footage and get that sent to the police?
Hmm , seems to get more attention when Muslims are involved.
Ah I remember when they was something wrote on a mosque wall few years ago in the uk,msm was all over it,turned out it was the iman of the mosque,this community always likes to play the victims and stir up trouble.
Imagine calling this bollocks a terrorist attack 😂
It’s aggressive littering at worst, if it’s true. Throwing a can at night over a gate is not terrorism
It’s always alleged attack when its against Muslims but of the is a chance Muslim did it then it’s guaranteed Muslim attack
13 comments
>Central Oxford Mosque claim that a red petrol can was thrown over its gates at around 10.30am with the wordings ‘IDF RULE’ and ‘IDF’.
It’s now being investigated as a [hate crime](https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/23886824.police-treating-oxford-mosque-attack-hate-crime/).
Edit: A picture of the [red petrol can](https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy83X65IavC/?hl=en) is uploaded on their Instagram page
Did the attackers shout “this is jew country” as well?
I do love the term ‘alleged’ thrown into headlines for attacks on mosques yet ‘it most definitely was an attack on the Jewish community without a shadow of a doubt’ headlines.
Sadly it highlights the inconsistency in reporting these incidents accurately and with impartiality , and I genuinely don’t know what can be done about it.
Note: this news article imo reported this correctly : namely it is alleged UNTIL it is confirmed.
This is horrific. People deserve to feel safe in their places of worship, and if the perpetrator is Jewish, they theyre an absolute Shande.
> Alleged ‘attack’
Putting the word attack in quote marks seems a bit over the top when the headline already starts with “alleged”.
It’s not an alleged “attack”, it’s an alleged attack. If the allegations are true then it’s definitely an attack and a racially motivated hate crime.
This tone, and so much of the discourse from the government and the right wing media seems to be telling people that if their skin is a bit darker then any attack on them isn’t really as serious. And even if it is, they probably deserve it because someone else somewhere in the world also had dark skin and did something wrong so they deserve some kind of collective punishment.
they will get a new free top of the range security system fitted at taxpayers expense ,,,allegedly,,,
they will get a new free top of the range security system fitted at taxpayers expense ,,,allegedly,,,
Your third paragraph is confusing and somewhat bizarre, not sure how any of that reflects reality in any way. I’m guessing it indicates your perception of the world around you but to the rest of us it comes across as odd to put it very politely and unhinged ramblings to put it less politely.
It could certainly be considered a hate crime but presumably it would be based on faith/religion and not race/ethnicity.
So did it happen? I’m confused, do we have some proof of it actually happening? I presume they have CCTV round the mosque? Can we get the footage and get that sent to the police?
Hmm , seems to get more attention when Muslims are involved.
Ah I remember when they was something wrote on a mosque wall few years ago in the uk,msm was all over it,turned out it was the iman of the mosque,this community always likes to play the victims and stir up trouble.
Imagine calling this bollocks a terrorist attack 😂
It’s aggressive littering at worst, if it’s true. Throwing a can at night over a gate is not terrorism
It’s always alleged attack when its against Muslims but of the is a chance Muslim did it then it’s guaranteed Muslim attack