If you allow third parties to post their own unvetted stuff next to your content, then that’s the risk you take.
The Guardians more than capable of doing that themselves to be fair
OK, so click bait of the week backfired and now they are blaming it on AI?
I guess “spot the racist” wasn’t getting their usual rage clicks so they decided to up the game with “who died how”.
GTFO. No one believes you Guardian.
The Guardian accused of damaging The Guardians’ reputation by publishing articles from The Guardian
>The poll, created by an AI program, asked: “What do you think is the reason behind the woman’s death?” Readers were then asked to choose from three options: murder, accident or suicide.
5 comments
This kind of thing isn’t exactly new.
Private Eye has had the *Malgorithms* section dedicated to this kind of stupidity for years – including some examples from [The Guardian back in 2020](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EbHKRN8XQAAYIF6?format=jpg&name=small), or a few other [from 2019](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-3_3mpWsAA5WqG?format=jpg&name=900×900).
If you allow third parties to post their own unvetted stuff next to your content, then that’s the risk you take.
The Guardians more than capable of doing that themselves to be fair
OK, so click bait of the week backfired and now they are blaming it on AI?
I guess “spot the racist” wasn’t getting their usual rage clicks so they decided to up the game with “who died how”.
GTFO. No one believes you Guardian.
The Guardian accused of damaging The Guardians’ reputation by publishing articles from The Guardian
>The poll, created by an AI program, asked: “What do you think is the reason behind the woman’s death?” Readers were then asked to choose from three options: murder, accident or suicide.
Don’t keep us in suspense, which was it?