‘The Marvels’ Director ‘Really Wanted’ the Film to Be ‘Under Two Hours’: ‘There’s No Need to Have it Long if You Don’t Need To’

by Moonskaraos

10 comments
  1. That’s good. Before, movies didn’t last two hours and they are masterpieces. I don’t understand the need now for blockbusters to last more than two hours

  2. Why do people hate long movies so much? If a movie feels too long, it is generally more complex than being too many minutes.

  3. I would say that older movies were long when it was justified. Newer movies seem to be sometimes long for no reason

  4. Personally I’d rather have a longer movie than one that feels rushed due to a desire to hit a specific runtime.

  5. Two side. Paying for tickets (IMAX/Screen X/4DX) family and/or date. I want my money’s worth. I also think movies shouldn’t just be long just to be long.

    There are movies that are long where it feels time is flying. There are long movies where you’re looking at your watch like “damn, is it over yet?”

  6. That’s fair. But the budget and the movie kinda calls for a little more. You have basically 2 main characters you need to give backstory and value to.

  7. This was very considerate toward the audience. Every minute spent watching this inevitable disaster of a movie is a minute that viewers will never get back.

  8. I feel like so many of the new marvel movies are long because they are so over stuffed with crossover plots and character bloat. I would really like to see marvel strip things back down and just give us straightforward good stories without 50 minutes of metaberse bullcrap.

  9. Is anyone else terrified of this film. Not of the plot but of it’s potential to be god awful. I really want it to be good but like I said I’m worried

Leave a Reply