Money laundering blights the reputations of political entities which facilitate it.
Phew.
At least “their” money is OK and the leaders have some nice mansions to stay in.
Walk down Knightsbridge or through Mayfair on a Friday night. It’s as we would say, stockdunkel. Just street after street of empty houses that don’t serve any other purpose but to keep the wealth of dictators, theocrats, and oligarchs.
Thank god, I was worried about the elites for a minute then
London loves dictatorships
Classic.
Nice. Then the British government can stop whomever ends up being in control of Kazakhstan from ever accessing that wealth, just like they do for Venezuela and Afghanistan, and point out how terrible the new ‘regime’ is when the local people have no access to resources.
Literally what the fuck are you even on about? Kazakhstan is an amazingly equal country, far ahead the West.
There’s a hole in the world like a great black pit
And the vermin of the world inhabit it
And it’s morals aren’t worth what a pig can spit
And it goes by the name of London
Who will think of the regime’s joyriding kids?
Kazakhstan is europe now? Wtf did i miss?
What about Pakistan? Same longitude so, Pakistan news ok?
Every post Soviet dictatorship has its money in London, Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan.
I believe Georgia and Armenia are the ones not involved.
Ban them from London and they will chill in Moscow or Beijing instead.
The world always inequality
Isn’t this what the rich in some countries do, fly over to Western countries. Let their wives give birth and get the children a passport which has less restrictions worldwide than their own country. Flee and fly over, when life gets more troublesome in their country instead of being a change for the better for their country. All of it’s is legal of course. But it has an unethical feeling to me.
20 comments
Shit system attracts shit people
Shit system attracts shit people
Money laundering blights the reputations of political entities which facilitate it.
Phew.
At least “their” money is OK and the leaders have some nice mansions to stay in.
Walk down Knightsbridge or through Mayfair on a Friday night. It’s as we would say, stockdunkel. Just street after street of empty houses that don’t serve any other purpose but to keep the wealth of dictators, theocrats, and oligarchs.
Thank god, I was worried about the elites for a minute then
London loves dictatorships
Classic.
Nice. Then the British government can stop whomever ends up being in control of Kazakhstan from ever accessing that wealth, just like they do for Venezuela and Afghanistan, and point out how terrible the new ‘regime’ is when the local people have no access to resources.
Sensing a theme here
It has nothing to do with inequality
Not just wealth but also Kazakh elite uses British courts against opponents:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/18/world/europe/uk-courts-russia-kazakhstan.html
Literally what the fuck are you even on about? Kazakhstan is an amazingly equal country, far ahead the West.
There’s a hole in the world like a great black pit
And the vermin of the world inhabit it
And it’s morals aren’t worth what a pig can spit
And it goes by the name of London
Who will think of the regime’s joyriding kids?
Kazakhstan is europe now? Wtf did i miss?
What about Pakistan? Same longitude so, Pakistan news ok?
Every post Soviet dictatorship has its money in London, Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan.
I believe Georgia and Armenia are the ones not involved.
Ban them from London and they will chill in Moscow or Beijing instead.
The world always inequality
Isn’t this what the rich in some countries do, fly over to Western countries. Let their wives give birth and get the children a passport which has less restrictions worldwide than their own country. Flee and fly over, when life gets more troublesome in their country instead of being a change for the better for their country. All of it’s is legal of course. But it has an unethical feeling to me.