Of all the individual pieces of equipment we’ve sent Ukraine, I think HIMARS might be the only one you could consider close to a “game changer” on its own. That phrase got tossed around with all kinds of stuff we were planning on sending Ukraine. I always rolled my eyes cause no one weapon can actually change the outcome of a war on its own. But with HIMARS it’s pretty close. They’ve been a consistent means of precision strike from striking ammo dumps forcing Russia to disperse them, to command posts, to hitting AA systems, to pounding the shit out of the bridges before the Kherson counteroffensive. They have to have made a substantial impact on the war overall.
4 comments
Straight up deleted. Looks like a strike on a command post.
South of Donetsk City at [47.91695, 37.72942](https://www.google.com/maps/place/47%C2%B055'01.0%22N+37%C2%B043'45.9%22E/@47.9377651,37.6177293,24631m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d47.9169444!4d37.7294167?entry=ttu)
If anyone [remember this strike from June](https://twitter.com/PaulJawin/status/1668619525347241987), its in the exact same spot
Adios losers
Of all the individual pieces of equipment we’ve sent Ukraine, I think HIMARS might be the only one you could consider close to a “game changer” on its own. That phrase got tossed around with all kinds of stuff we were planning on sending Ukraine. I always rolled my eyes cause no one weapon can actually change the outcome of a war on its own. But with HIMARS it’s pretty close. They’ve been a consistent means of precision strike from striking ammo dumps forcing Russia to disperse them, to command posts, to hitting AA systems, to pounding the shit out of the bridges before the Kherson counteroffensive. They have to have made a substantial impact on the war overall.