I was reliably informed this makes you a nazi and an incorrigible racist
that’s the way it is, invading a countries by all young men without checking their background with different ideologies should end before they desire to enforce sharia law in Germany or another european countries start.
This is going to cause severe cognitive dissonance with the left leaning Remainers.
So this plan that thousands of shrill “progressives” in the UK denounced as being evidence of “fascism”, of our cruelty, our wholesale embrace of the far-right and our rejection of fundamental human rights, is in fact increasingly being picked up our neighbours as perhaps a sensible, pragmatic and legally consistent approach to the problem after all. Who’d of thought?!
Do you think we’ll hear some sort of apology from those who were doing the denouncing, or an acknowledgement or acceptance that they were in the wrong? Like hell we will.
Predictably, they don’t give one hoot about our international reputation or about human rights in reality, they just couldn’t stand the thought that someone might be taking some sort of decisive action on the issue of irregular migration.
Why? Because they don’t see it as a problem that needs to be addressed. In fact I’d go so far as to say that many – for varying, and I suspect highly warped, reasons – actively want ongoing mass migration, illegal or otherwise. They support it, I suspect precisely because they know the damage it’s doing and for the schadenfreude of seeing their political opponents become agitated over it – but they can’t say the quiet part out loud just yet.
What’s being discussed in Germany is *not* the same as the UK’s plans to ship migrants to Rwanda. AFAIK, the German government is considering setting up asylum processing centres in source and transit countries where refugees would have their applications vetted before traveling on to Germany, rather than flying those who are already in Europe to random third countries.
Agreeing to consider, committing to discussing, planning to review, contemplating debating, examining the options…. Yeah man, that’s all the top level European leaders ever do until reality hits them in the face.
“agrees to consider”
Well that’s a far stretch to make this into a headline
UK-style? I mean the UK government got their Rwanda plan idea from Denmark’s Rwanda plan that was announced a year before. Surely this should be “Denmark-style”.
Denmark-style plan.
I think that the Australian model is more effective. Not only to Germany but to the whole EU.
Too little too late. Thanks Mutti.
They were shitting on UK for doing this right ?
Denmark invented it. The UK copied it from Denmark.
The plan thats been put on hold for years and there is still no solid agreement on?
19 comments
old habits die hard
I was reliably informed this makes you a nazi and an incorrigible racist
that’s the way it is, invading a countries by all young men without checking their background with different ideologies should end before they desire to enforce sharia law in Germany or another european countries start.
This is going to cause severe cognitive dissonance with the left leaning Remainers.
So this plan that thousands of shrill “progressives” in the UK denounced as being evidence of “fascism”, of our cruelty, our wholesale embrace of the far-right and our rejection of fundamental human rights, is in fact increasingly being picked up our neighbours as perhaps a sensible, pragmatic and legally consistent approach to the problem after all. Who’d of thought?!
Do you think we’ll hear some sort of apology from those who were doing the denouncing, or an acknowledgement or acceptance that they were in the wrong? Like hell we will.
Predictably, they don’t give one hoot about our international reputation or about human rights in reality, they just couldn’t stand the thought that someone might be taking some sort of decisive action on the issue of irregular migration.
Why? Because they don’t see it as a problem that needs to be addressed. In fact I’d go so far as to say that many – for varying, and I suspect highly warped, reasons – actively want ongoing mass migration, illegal or otherwise. They support it, I suspect precisely because they know the damage it’s doing and for the schadenfreude of seeing their political opponents become agitated over it – but they can’t say the quiet part out loud just yet.
“Agrees to consider”
Reminds me of the Life of Brian with the emergency meeting – [“this calls for immediate discussion – completely new motion”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YawagQ6lLrA)
“consider”… so, no.
I never realised how many refugees germany had.I thought it was around 2 million but its [3.3 million](https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/rekordzahl-gefluechtete-100.html)
Germany u ok?
What’s being discussed in Germany is *not* the same as the UK’s plans to ship migrants to Rwanda. AFAIK, the German government is considering setting up asylum processing centres in source and transit countries where refugees would have their applications vetted before traveling on to Germany, rather than flying those who are already in Europe to random third countries.
Agreeing to consider, committing to discussing, planning to review, contemplating debating, examining the options…. Yeah man, that’s all the top level European leaders ever do until reality hits them in the face.
“agrees to consider”
Well that’s a far stretch to make this into a headline
UK-style? I mean the UK government got their Rwanda plan idea from Denmark’s Rwanda plan that was announced a year before. Surely this should be “Denmark-style”.
Denmark-style plan.
I think that the Australian model is more effective. Not only to Germany but to the whole EU.
Too little too late. Thanks Mutti.
They were shitting on UK for doing this right ?
Denmark invented it. The UK copied it from Denmark.
The plan thats been put on hold for years and there is still no solid agreement on?
Just do it already.