Correction: looks like hour-averaged numbers, for teh whoole area, not by-generator numbers.
/edit
Where is that graph from? I would like to understand how they come up with the CO2 equivalents for e.g. nuclear fuel especially when you consider the uranium enrichment process and the CO2 emissions from keeping the waste “safely” stored for 1 million years. Most structures would not last 1000 years, so the CO2 from the repeated construction and inspection would need to be factored in too.
Electricity generation vs CO2e/kwh is very informative, but I’d be more interested in the type of power plant that the location o each power plant. We all know Germany and Poland are dirty with a lot of coal, and France is clean with nuclear but it would be better to just see for each dot what the power plant is.
Anyways, it’s clear that nuclear is a fantastic source of electricity that has been sadly neglected in the decades of the past by all but France. It’s not just due to climate change either: The air pollution of coal, oil etc killed a lot of people.
What’s wrong with DK?
Good job france
Germany on it’s best day can’t beat France on it’s worst.
Belgium will soon migrate upwards as the nuclear plants are replaced by fossil fuels ones. (As our ‘greens’ demand it.)
Based Portugal
Updated/interactive live data for most countries in Europe and many worldwide. Click on each country for a summary (click in the white space of the summary to toggle it off again). A 24hr summary is displayed too.
The flashing chevrons are cross-border connections that tell you which direction the electricity is flowing, the capacity and the amount being used.
18 comments
Visual made by Thomas Auriel
Just one question: What uranium abundance percentage is used to calculate the CO2 intensity for nuclear power plants here?
Some [complement](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ernx9iyXcAEjBmf?format=jpg&name=4096×4096), and another [way](https://old.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/rwgkz5/carbon_intensity_of_different_places_throughout/) to look at it.
Correction: looks like hour-averaged numbers, for teh whoole area, not by-generator numbers.
/edit
Where is that graph from? I would like to understand how they come up with the CO2 equivalents for e.g. nuclear fuel especially when you consider the uranium enrichment process and the CO2 emissions from keeping the waste “safely” stored for 1 million years. Most structures would not last 1000 years, so the CO2 from the repeated construction and inspection would need to be factored in too.
Why aren’t all eu countries represented?
Electric cars in Poland don’t make as much sense as in France. According to [this graphic](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/images/20190321PHT32209/20190321PHT32209-pl.jpg) electric cars could be more polluting than diesel/petrol cars. [Source](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20190313STO31218/co2-emissions-from-cars-facts-and-figures-infographics)
Electricity generation vs CO2e/kwh is very informative, but I’d be more interested in the type of power plant that the location o each power plant. We all know Germany and Poland are dirty with a lot of coal, and France is clean with nuclear but it would be better to just see for each dot what the power plant is.
Anyways, it’s clear that nuclear is a fantastic source of electricity that has been sadly neglected in the decades of the past by all but France. It’s not just due to climate change either: The air pollution of coal, oil etc killed a lot of people.
What’s wrong with DK?
Good job france
Germany on it’s best day can’t beat France on it’s worst.
Belgium will soon migrate upwards as the nuclear plants are replaced by fossil fuels ones. (As our ‘greens’ demand it.)
Based Portugal
Updated/interactive live data for most countries in Europe and many worldwide. Click on each country for a summary (click in the white space of the summary to toggle it off again). A 24hr summary is displayed too.
The flashing chevrons are cross-border connections that tell you which direction the electricity is flowing, the capacity and the amount being used.
[https://app.electricitymap.org/map](https://app.electricitymap.org/map)
Another Swiss masterclass
Look at this may nuclear actualy be the right place holder until we have a way to efectivly store wind and solar energy?
What does one dot represent here?
Also electricity is like a quarter of the primary energy usage, so a graph like [this (german)](https://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/europa/75140/themengrafikenergiemix-nach-staaten) is more close to the actual energy-based emission, which still leaves out agricultural and waste emissions.
What’s wrong with nuclear so?
Go France, go nucleair!