Crossbow law review bittersweet, says partner of murdered man

4 comments
  1. It’s been coming for a while as there have been a handful of attacks the last few years.
    Next will be compound bows then recurves then slingshots.

  2. The takeaway from this is that suddenly crossbow law needs urgent review because Queen. Average person killed, Priti didn’t care about it.

    The person in the article was shot by a crossbow and survived, her partner sadly died.

    ‘Ms Sugden said the home secretary had told her in the summer that she would not review the legislation.

    She said: “I am delighted to hear Priti Patel is going to review the current rules, I’m just saddened that Shane’s death and everyone else before and after were not enough for her to look into it.

    “It is disheartening to think your family member didn’t matter.”‘

    I think she has a point…

  3. Surely, Longbows should be looked at. I mean, we kinda have a huge history of using them for violent means. Ban crossbows and people will spend a decade training to become a longbowmen. Ban longbows and we end up with Saxon Shield Walls. Ban Saxon SHield Walls and we end as Roman Britian.

  4. Morons should be banned, they will always find the tools of their trade.

    Moron with gun, ban guns
    Moron with knife, ban knives – what? well maybe just the big ones
    Moron with big truck driving into people – ban…. oh wait erm… .err mustn’t mention the morons ban something instead

Leave a Reply