Will be interesting to see if the North branch head nodder will get a call. But I’ll wager a guess that the greasy pole climbing careerists will suddenly realise those kiddies being murdered is for a good reason after all.
That’s a shame. Up until now he was doing so well. lol.
Time for big boy politics in the grown up world. You get to be an opposition with simplistic morality or a government that deals in realities.
“Don’t you fucking dare vote to end this war” says former human rights lawyer.
If I was insistent that this was a point scoring vote that wasn’t going to do the world of difference I simply wouldn’t make it a sackable offence.
[deleted]
Can labour members call a vote of no confidence? This seems mad
I’m getting really convinced he’s trying to lose Labour the next election…
Wow .. a Torygraph article 🙄🙄🙄🤦♂️
The perversity of the fact that these headlines are exactly what Labour leadership wants.
There’s good votes in not opposing the deaths of 1,000 kids.
they dont want ceasefire they want to drag us into ww3, no matter which party it seems, i dont even follow politics now, they are all the establishment, playing good cop bad cop taking turns, im in my 50s and wonder why people get so involved in tribal stuff they are all terrible, watching yes minister, its still funny cos its the same old shit, yet no one is laughing at the prospect of losing sons and husbands to the warmongering
and we are helpless to stop it
Well, over to you, Murray and Shanks.
Do you follow the STUC, Sarwar, Lennon, Leonard, Villalba, et al and call for a **bilateral** ceasefire, just before at least three of the five Holyrood parties are about to vote for it, or do you value your remaining year in Westminster enough that you’ll simply demand a “pause” where civilians can avoid being shelled just long enough to be ethnically cleansed and never allowed back to the site of what was their home?
After all, yes, there are civilians dying in entirely preventable manners and the majority of housing now destroyed, but you might get rewarded with a nice ministerial post so long as you deride the majority of the country as “sixth formers” enough that you get a nice writeup by some touchy-feely bald bloke or daughter of a viscount in The Times ahead of the next election. And isn’t that what “grown-up politics” is all about?
Starmer got into power on the back of anti semetism allegations against his predecessor, so it makes sense hes terrified of being accused of the same.
I can see it now…
“Abraham, cancel the airstrike, Labour rebels have said we’ve to stop”
15 comments
Will be interesting to see if the North branch head nodder will get a call. But I’ll wager a guess that the greasy pole climbing careerists will suddenly realise those kiddies being murdered is for a good reason after all.
That’s a shame. Up until now he was doing so well. lol.
Time for big boy politics in the grown up world. You get to be an opposition with simplistic morality or a government that deals in realities.
“Don’t you fucking dare vote to end this war” says former human rights lawyer.
If I was insistent that this was a point scoring vote that wasn’t going to do the world of difference I simply wouldn’t make it a sackable offence.
[deleted]
Can labour members call a vote of no confidence? This seems mad
I’m getting really convinced he’s trying to lose Labour the next election…
Wow .. a Torygraph article 🙄🙄🙄🤦♂️
The perversity of the fact that these headlines are exactly what Labour leadership wants.
There’s good votes in not opposing the deaths of 1,000 kids.
they dont want ceasefire they want to drag us into ww3, no matter which party it seems, i dont even follow politics now, they are all the establishment, playing good cop bad cop taking turns, im in my 50s and wonder why people get so involved in tribal stuff they are all terrible, watching yes minister, its still funny cos its the same old shit, yet no one is laughing at the prospect of losing sons and husbands to the warmongering
and we are helpless to stop it
Well, over to you, Murray and Shanks.
Do you follow the STUC, Sarwar, Lennon, Leonard, Villalba, et al and call for a **bilateral** ceasefire, just before at least three of the five Holyrood parties are about to vote for it, or do you value your remaining year in Westminster enough that you’ll simply demand a “pause” where civilians can avoid being shelled just long enough to be ethnically cleansed and never allowed back to the site of what was their home?
After all, yes, there are civilians dying in entirely preventable manners and the majority of housing now destroyed, but you might get rewarded with a nice ministerial post so long as you deride the majority of the country as “sixth formers” enough that you get a nice writeup by some touchy-feely bald bloke or daughter of a viscount in The Times ahead of the next election. And isn’t that what “grown-up politics” is all about?
Starmer got into power on the back of anti semetism allegations against his predecessor, so it makes sense hes terrified of being accused of the same.
I can see it now…
“Abraham, cancel the airstrike, Labour rebels have said we’ve to stop”
What the fuck is he doing..