Trudeau kritisierte seine Forderung an Israel, in Gaza „maximale Zurückhaltung zu üben“.

by ubcstaffer123

31 comments
  1. Seems asking for a state to stop bombing civilians and babies is now considered controversial… what a world we live in.

  2. Another one sided biased leader. He made the token mention of Hamas saying to please stop using Palestinian’s as shields but made no mention of:

    * Stopping Hamas and other terrorists from targeting Israeli civilians
    * Providing a method to root out Hamas from Gaza if Israel’s methods are not the right ones to Canada
    * Mentioned the killing of Palestinian women and children while ignoring Israel’s losses

    Doesn’t he think if there was a way to get rid of Hamas without injuring any civilians that Israel would do this? Israel doesn’t want the negative publicity any more than he wants to mention this. Go back to your electric car show.

    Any leader who calls for ceasefire without providing an alternative approach is a useless paperweight. I hope they get voted out of offices if in a democracy.

  3. I guess some assholes wanna go the “just kill all of em route”. Because yeah that won’t cause All of us security issues for decades to come…

  4. I guess you can’t say anything other than “Israel can do no wrong, and they’re not murdering children, they’re merely future terrorists.”

  5. Every post about Trudeau has a large group of low-intelligence individuals frothing at the mouth for whatever he’s said or done today.

  6. Don’t know why restraint is a bad thing, yes I do. Conservative are using this to further their agenda.

  7. This is a completely reasonable thing for him to ask for. I can’t imagine what kind of moron froths at the mouth for more blood.

  8. Unless I am missing some key context, this is a pretty reasonable request. “Maximum retraint” doesn’t mean doing nothing, but this fight is amongst peoples homes and vital civlian infrastructure (no thanks to Hamas) and just something might be legal in the law of armed conflict doesn’t mean it is the right thing to do. There are other factors at play here.

  9. This conflict is so polarizing that people forget what it looks like to be reasonable.

  10. Did Canadian forces exercise maximum restraint in their fight against the Axis Powers?

  11. This is extremely reasonable to be demanded. A cease fire is not.

  12. I’ve never been much of a Trudeau fan myself, but seeing how much stupid people dislike him makes me like him more

  13. He is criticized for everything he does. It literally does not matter what he does.

    He is heckled, he is yelled at, he is threatened. Then there are the fuck Trudeau stickers and flags. I don’t care how you feel about the guy just be respectful.

    Until it’s time to actually vote can we all just bring the temperature down a few degrees?

  14. This just goes to show that israelis can’t tolerate any level criticism or examination of their hideous slaughter.

    Ceasefire now.

  15. As a Canadian, I think Trudeau is a tool but the way everyone is roasting him like he asked for Children to be executed…….oh wait that is what the Israeli Military is doing. My bad brown kids deserve to die. Carry on.

    Edit: I like how everyone commenting on this is rebuking something along the lines of oh “Why are bringing race into this” or I am being anti-Semite but no one denying that innocent children are being killed. What a sad world we live in.

  16. lol well the critics can fuck off. This is an exceedingly reasonable call

  17. Well he shouldn’t be. Criticized that is. It’s a very practical and reasonable take. Good for him!
    I wish US Politicians weren’t such absolute fucking cowards.

  18. Some people here really justifying the murder of children.

  19. Why is that deserving of criticism? That should be the default position for all western nations. We have a power imbalance over the rest of the world, and it is our responsibility not to misuse that.

  20. How did we get here? It doesn’t matter if you consider yourself pro-palestine or pro Isreal, or simply pro human lives. How is this considered controversial. It’s a completely reasonable standpoint to take. I understand the nature of Isreal fight, I get that they got a tough fight ahead of them in a very messy battlezone. But obviously they have to show the utmost respect for the civilians who in many cases are stuck under Hamas. I absolutely support Isreals right to defend themselves. But respecting civilian lives and showing absolute restraint is important, and it shouldn’t be controversial to ask for that.

  21. Since nobody read the article, they are only citing two people’s criticism of Trudeau. Netanyahu by way of a tweet, and Michael Levitt

    > a former Liberal MP who now serves as the president and CEO of the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre

    I’m sure everyone here has already taken this non-story and internalized it according to their existing beliefs.

  22. If he said the opposite he’s be criticized, if he said nothing he’d be criticized, eventually you just become numb to it.

  23. I’m not a supporter of his but this is a very reasonable request

  24. I’d say “would Trudeau exercise maximum restraint going after a nation that slaughtered 1,400 Canadians?”, but he’d probably not even retaliate and be like “it’s just their culture, we need to be more understanding.”

Leave a Reply