Warner Bros.’s Coyote Vs. Acme fiasco attracts congressional attention by Cicada_5 Tags:EntertainmentUnited States 4 comments Seems silly to get involved. There is nothing anticompetitive about it as they own the property. If anything, it’s a sign tax laws need to change to prevent gains from a write off. As of now, that’s perfectly legal apparently. First they came for Batgirl. Then they came for Scooby. But when they came for the Coyote, the government stepped in. Why are we subsidizing the entertainment industry? Finally, our government focusing on issue that matter to me. Hopefully the 2025 agenda mandates a Seinfeld reboot too. Oh, and let’s force Led Zeppelin to do a reunion tour. Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
Seems silly to get involved. There is nothing anticompetitive about it as they own the property. If anything, it’s a sign tax laws need to change to prevent gains from a write off. As of now, that’s perfectly legal apparently.
First they came for Batgirl. Then they came for Scooby. But when they came for the Coyote, the government stepped in.
Finally, our government focusing on issue that matter to me. Hopefully the 2025 agenda mandates a Seinfeld reboot too. Oh, and let’s force Led Zeppelin to do a reunion tour.
4 comments
Seems silly to get involved.
There is nothing anticompetitive about it as they own the property.
If anything, it’s a sign tax laws need to change to prevent gains from a write off.
As of now, that’s perfectly legal apparently.
First they came for Batgirl.
Then they came for Scooby.
But when they came for the Coyote, the government stepped in.
Why are we subsidizing the entertainment industry?
Finally, our government focusing on issue that matter to me. Hopefully the 2025 agenda mandates a Seinfeld reboot too.
Oh, and let’s force Led Zeppelin to do a reunion tour.