This article includes enough information to be able to conclude that the monarchy is not beneficial for the anything except themselves should be abolished.
The Queen – that darling of everyone’s hearts, is funding the defense of a person who mixed with dubious people in very dubious circumstances. At the very least!
It says that she is doing it from her “private income”? Who swallows this rubbish? The Queen only has a private income because she is the Queen and took it from the people.
The Queen has shown herself to be petty and nasty (no photo or mention of Harry or Megan during her speech) and a defender of the indefensible. She is a moral and financial drag on the UK.
1 comment
This article includes enough information to be able to conclude that the monarchy is not beneficial for the anything except themselves should be abolished.
The Queen – that darling of everyone’s hearts, is funding the defense of a person who mixed with dubious people in very dubious circumstances. At the very least!
It says that she is doing it from her “private income”? Who swallows this rubbish? The Queen only has a private income because she is the Queen and took it from the people.
The Queen has shown herself to be petty and nasty (no photo or mention of Harry or Megan during her speech) and a defender of the indefensible. She is a moral and financial drag on the UK.