This is a lot better than I thought. 20% of Schools have full staff, 70% pupils in attendance, only 25% of SNAs are not available. The way people were going on made it sound a lot worse. Clearly opening the schools was the correct call.
Good time to start subbing so?
The fact that so these numbers are so round makes it look like they surveyed about five schools
I’d love to see this overlaid with the average pre-covid statistics. If a school has one teacher out, they’d fall into the 80% by this metric. It felt like to me that when I was in school, there was always at least one teacher out.
The access to subs does seem alarmingly low, however.
4 comments
This is a lot better than I thought. 20% of Schools have full staff, 70% pupils in attendance, only 25% of SNAs are not available. The way people were going on made it sound a lot worse. Clearly opening the schools was the correct call.
Good time to start subbing so?
The fact that so these numbers are so round makes it look like they surveyed about five schools
I’d love to see this overlaid with the average pre-covid statistics. If a school has one teacher out, they’d fall into the 80% by this metric. It felt like to me that when I was in school, there was always at least one teacher out.
The access to subs does seem alarmingly low, however.