Indiana killed net metering, solar down 67%, utility now seeking 23% rate increase

by manual_tranny

3 comments
  1. ​

    so when it’s cold, it’s better to pay for 100% the energy you *need* to keep things comfortable, instead of using sunlight to offset 50-80% of it?

    ​

    it would appear that selling energy is not possible because you’re still taking from the grid… why is net metering a problem if you have NOTHING TO SELL?

    ​

    “best” you could ever do is not pay for consumption for as long as you need to consume.

    ​

    >utility now seeking 23% rate increase

    so… solar would be saving ANOTHER 23% per unit?

    ​

    why the focus on profit?

    ​

    **Big-box stores could help slash emissions and save millions by putting solar panels on roofs. Why aren’t more of them doing it?**

    [https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/20/us/solar-power-on-big-box-store-rooftops-climate/index.html](https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/20/us/solar-power-on-big-box-store-rooftops-climate/index.html)

    At the IKEA store in Baltimore, installing solar panels on the roof and over the store’s parking lot cut the amount of energy it needed to purchase by 84%, slashing its costs by 57% from September to December of 2020,

Leave a Reply