Der britische Moderator sagt, der Austausch von 150 Gefangenen gegen 50 Geiseln bedeute, dass palästinensische Leben weniger wert seien

by Yanaytsabary

38 comments

  3. It clearly shows Israel places much more value on their peoples lives than Hamas does.

  4. His face when she said that was the funniest thing I’ve seen this shit

  5. How do you even respond to something like that?

    Our country is willing to let murderers walk free to attack us again, just to save children at 0.33 the rate. And this shows we’re the bad guys?

    There is no winning with brain washed British media.

  6. Didn’t they swap like a thousand prisoners for Gilad Shalit a couple years ago?

  7. Yes, both Hamas and Israel consider Israeli lives to be worth more than Palestinain.

    Israel will happily kill Palestinains if it means less dead Israelis, and Hamas would happily sacrifice Palestinains if it means more dead Israelis.

    It really sucks for the Palestinian Civilians stuck between the two.

  8. Shouldnt they be happy they get a 1 for 3 deal? Thats a winning situation if you ask me.

  10. This person needs to go back to primary school and redo math.

  11. That’s correct, the value Israel assigns to Israeli lives is much higher than the value Hamas assigns to Palestinian lives.

  14. Christ these morons are exhausting. Stop watching these fuckin clowns

  16. British people are nuts
    . what’s wrong with that Island.

  17. I’m sure Israel forced them to take back so many

  18. It’s surreal how every single act of Israel is twisted to portray the country as wicked. It’s winning a war and yet is exchanging three times as many for its own, releasing people who committed acts of violence while receiving innocent civilians, and this? A sign of racism, perhaps.

    I don’t even know where to begin with this one.

  19. I think this exemplifies why Israel is starting to give less and less of a shit of what the international news media thinks of them.

  20. No, it just means the Israeli’s value their people more.

  21. The assertion that Israel values Palestinian lives less due to the prisoner exchange ratio is fundamentally flawed. It’s clear from the exchange terms that it’s actually Hamas who values Palestinian lives less, as they require to exchange a greater number of Palestinian prisoners for fewer Israeli hostages. Her logic, when properly applied, leads to this opposite conclusion.

  22. Side A: 90 suicide bombings since 1989

    Side B: Zero suicide bombings ever

    Which “lives” are worth more?

  23. Israelis are swapping terrorists in return for children and this is what that air head “reporter” has to ask?!?! Mind boggling

  24. Glass half empty kind of guy. I’m interpreting this as they are valuing their own citizens safety more then foreign prisoners. Pretty sure most country with a sane government would do the same.

  25. Kay Burley is an idiot, always trying to be controversial for attention. She was taken off air for 6 months for flaunting lockdown rules a couple of years ago and Sky News was so much better without her

  26. Hamas is leveraging the one advantage they have. They know how Israel responds to hostages from previous experience.

  27. Worth less … to Hamas.

    That’s how trades work. The value is based on what you are getting.

  28. Lol what a dumb comment. I’m sure Israel wouldn’t mind if hamas wanted to swap 150 for 150

  29. why does she even have a job? She is as stupid as a human can get

  30. Wait until she learns that Israel released 1027 prisoners (one of them is the founder of the military wing of Hamas) in exchange for Gilad Shalit

  31. This is, like, aggressively stupid. There are legitimate criticism to level against Israel, but this just shows the insane mental gymnastics that people will perform to paint Israel as evil.

  32. The U.S. historically “doesn’t negotiate w terrorists” Israel historically values their citizens lives above all, and thus has historically has traded many prisoners for one captured Israeli. Are the events of Jan 7 partly to due to this? Does this policy ultimately fuel the incentive to terrorize and specifically take hostages?

  33. Does she understand how negotiations work?? How can she ask something like this without being embarrassed of herself?

  34. I’ll be honest, I never really believed it before when Israel complained about overwhelming bias against them in the international community, at the UN, etc. I always thought it was a case of “no smoke without a fire”.

    The last month and a half has opened my eyes. Sorry for doubting you guys.

  35. In 2000 Syrian president Abdul Khalim said he will consider Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon as an act of war. The schizophrenic logic of that statement as well as this one by the British anchor are in fact perfectly consistent from an antisemitic perspective where each action of a jewish state is always interpreted as an act of evil.

  36. So. The Palestinians themselves insisted on it. They must believe it.

  37. It means Palestinians value their terrorist prisoners less than Israel cares about their innocent hostages.

  38. I am quite sure Israel wouldn’t have protested if Hamas would have traded all hostages for those 150 prisoners…what a dumb narrative attempt

Leave a Reply