Der israelische Nationale Sicherheitsberater Hanegbi deutet an, dass ein Krieg gegen die Hisbollah nach der Niederlage der Hamas wahrscheinlich sei

by Kimber80

19 comments
  1. There are 200,000 people who are refugees in Israel because of Hezbollah.

    Makes a lot of sense to get rid of this threat.

    Maybe the UN can actually enforce resolution 1701 – [https://peacemaker.un.org/israellebanon-resolution1701](https://peacemaker.un.org/israellebanon-resolution1701)

    But who am I Kidding, the UN will probably blame Israel for that.

  2. Now this is what a real war on terror looks like!

  3. Not smart to say this now just increases the likelihood Hezbollah enters war early or does something to surprise Israel, even if they are trying to temp them into the war.

  4. Israel is trying to threaten Hezbollah to abide by UNSC resolution 1701 willingly. If the threat wouldn’t work, then all bets are off.

  5. Invading Lebanon to root out Hezbollah makes no sense.
    Like most Islamist groups, their leaders will quickly relocate, in the case of Hezbollah, most likely to Damascus.
    A targeted campaign against Hezbollah’s top leadership is a more viable option. It is already happening on a smaller scale, but it should be stepped up.

  6. The lost should be:
    Hamas first
    West bank settlers/west bank aggressive Palestinians
    Then last should be Hezbollah

  7. First, they need to defeat Hamas which looks unlikely seeing as their soldiers only have experience in fighting rock throwers in the West Bank. Then they want to wage war against a paramilitary that swept ISIS, al-Nusra and FSA in Syria? They couldn’t do it the last time in 2006, what makes them think they can do it now?

  8. 1! 2! 3! 4! WE DONT WANT YOUR HOLEY WARS! 5! 6! 7! 8! END THE ABRAHAMIC CALIPHATES!

  9. Bibi trying so hard to stay on war footing long enough to convince people that that October 7th was the army/intelligence services’ fault

  10. It’s starting to feel like Netanyahu’s government doesn’t want peace. Almost like they thrive on constant war.

  11. Could be me but it struck me as weird that hamas did such an awful act with the intent to clash with the IDF but then not be backed up by their supposed allies hezbollah and iran.

    Seems to me like russia asked iran to sacrifice one of their pawns so supplies to Ukraine would be split between them and Israel (and the republicans being piss babies isn’t helping Ukraine either). I’m also guessing putin hoped for a drawn out urban guerilla war but the IDF seem to be making quick work of this. hezbollah has been putting up at least a facade by lobbing a missile here and there and then getting smoked by counter fire. But they are tying down IDF troops in the north, troops that could have been used to deal with hamas quicker.

    Just wondering if iran is willing to sacrifice hezbollah as well for putin’s imperialism. After that they only have their brigades in Iraq and Syria and their Houthis in Yemen left and I don’t think they’d be willing to risk a war after they lost all their auxiliries.

    But just so we’re clear, this is just me thinking this, could just be iran thinking the time was right to launch another war in these volatile times and be proven foolish by the IDF.

  12. Israel needs to step back after this operation. Hell let the US use its carrier force.

Leave a Reply