Because Stefanik is a pandering, two-faced, bad faith actor. She knows god damn well Trump is antiemetic but she’s a pure partisan — party over country. Whatever she can use as leverage to bash Democrats she will, no matter if its hypocritical. She’s an amoral, craven coward.
I’m not sure I understand how Trump deals in antisemitism? Didn’t he recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel early in his presidency? His daughter converted and married into Judaism? His son in law was a Senior Advisor and milked $2 billion out of Saudi? Did I miss something?
This is what I have been saying. The same people grilling the University presidents on anti-Semitism are the same people who said Charlottesville anti-Semitic chants were “good people on both sides”.
Ask what is was different in the Charlottesville situation?
He’s got a point.
Pandering to the Nazi vote
Stefanik being a hypocrite doesn’t change the fact that she asked if calling for genocide of Jews was against university policy, and the presidents said no
Democrats still assuming Republicans have shame.
I also remember her going on and on about Andrew Cuomo being a “sexual predator” while simultaneously supporting Trump, who has like 30 sexual assault allegations against him and also one for rape.
Stefanik is a two-faced, phony piece of shit.
>“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. **They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert**. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
>
>― Jean-Paul Sartre, 1946
Especially in the age of the AR-15, when we’ve had, you know, genocidal-style language being used, but also massacres taking place like at the Tree of Life synagogue, in Pittsburgh, or at the Buffalo supermarket. Those are right-wing antisemites who talk about the great replacement theory. We had a guy at Cornell, who was making death threats towards Jews, and we had three Palestinian college kids who were shot in Burlington, Vt., of all places.
And I’m sure she wants transparency from everyone else. Wonder if she wants to open up her campaigns books to show the faces and sources of those contributions she lives on.
so now we are in the alternate reality where Trump wasnt a gigantic friend to Israel and the military industrial complex or something?
[deleted]
Because she doesn’t care about antisemitism she cares about her career and the possibility of being Trump’s VP and having her on TV 24/7 is just gravy for her
She.does.not.care
Republicans hold no position. They hold goals and shift positions to the moment to achieve the goals.
While all performative, she did get the presidents to admit their bias. Those were softballs. I think she was surprised to hear their admissions.
Stefanik’s questions were bad faith and the presidents fell for it. They should’ve pointed out her hypocrisy and her attempts at misinformation instead of being the university diplomat.
I’m thinking about it as a father, as a parent,” Raskin replied in remarks highlighted by Mediate. “I mean, if my kids had been sent to college at great expense, like millions of people across the country, I want to know that, if somebody is actually calling for the genocide of the Jews or anybody else on campus, that we’ve got a college president who will say quickly get campus police over there, that person could be a danger to other people around them.
“The Hill has reached out to Stefanik’s office for comment on Raskin’s remarks.”
Good luck with that…sycophants and rabble rousers never stand accountable.
Stefanik isn’t dumb, she’s just craven and power hungry.
Article is basically a transcription of an interview on another outlet
He has goebbels eyes.
I want to know who and what is behind Stefanik. She clearly is an opportunist playing a role. She was seemingly gone for a few years after one of the impeachments, only to resurface during the speaker election madness. And now she’s acting like an a-hole during these hearings.
It was really, really nice when I didn’t have to see her face!
To be clear, Stefanik’s questioning was super disingenuous. The question was about how you define hate speech and Magill said it depends on the context, which is true. Stefanik then went on to point that comment toward comments about Jews, which was two questions ago. Typical conservative questioning. Always have to take comments out of context to find the right straws for their agenda.
He’s right. Stefanik cares about NOTHING! She used to be a no-name moderate in congress. It wasn’t until she want full trumpian demagogue that she started getting attention. What a waste of an Ivy League degree.
I absolutely LOATHE that bish. Shes a NASTY NASTY UGLY person.
She’s all in on mushroom penis.
Chemo got to Raskins brain
Lets be real, the only reasons republicans support Israel is that Leftists support Palestinians and that they hate brown people more than they hate Jewish people.
28 comments
Because Stefanik is a pandering, two-faced, bad faith actor. She knows god damn well Trump is antiemetic but she’s a pure partisan — party over country. Whatever she can use as leverage to bash Democrats she will, no matter if its hypocritical. She’s an amoral, craven coward.
I’m not sure I understand how Trump deals in antisemitism? Didn’t he recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel early in his presidency? His daughter converted and married into Judaism? His son in law was a Senior Advisor and milked $2 billion out of Saudi? Did I miss something?
This is what I have been saying. The same people grilling the University presidents on anti-Semitism are the same people who said Charlottesville anti-Semitic chants were “good people on both sides”.
Ask what is was different in the Charlottesville situation?
He’s got a point.
Pandering to the Nazi vote
Stefanik being a hypocrite doesn’t change the fact that she asked if calling for genocide of Jews was against university policy, and the presidents said no
Democrats still assuming Republicans have shame.
I also remember her going on and on about Andrew Cuomo being a “sexual predator” while simultaneously supporting Trump, who has like 30 sexual assault allegations against him and also one for rape.
Stefanik is a two-faced, phony piece of shit.
>“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. **They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert**. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
>
>― Jean-Paul Sartre, 1946
Especially in the age of the AR-15, when we’ve had, you know, genocidal-style language being used, but also massacres taking place like at the Tree of Life synagogue, in Pittsburgh, or at the Buffalo supermarket. Those are right-wing antisemites who talk about the great replacement theory. We had a guy at Cornell, who was making death threats towards Jews, and we had three Palestinian college kids who were shot in Burlington, Vt., of all places.
And I’m sure she wants transparency from everyone else. Wonder if she wants to open up her campaigns books to show the faces and sources of those contributions she lives on.
so now we are in the alternate reality where Trump wasnt a gigantic friend to Israel and the military industrial complex or something?
[deleted]
Because she doesn’t care about antisemitism she cares about her career and the possibility of being Trump’s VP and having her on TV 24/7 is just gravy for her
She.does.not.care
Republicans hold no position. They hold goals and shift positions to the moment to achieve the goals.
While all performative, she did get the presidents to admit their bias. Those were softballs. I think she was surprised to hear their admissions.
Stefanik’s questions were bad faith and the presidents fell for it. They should’ve pointed out her hypocrisy and her attempts at misinformation instead of being the university diplomat.
I’m thinking about it as a father, as a parent,” Raskin replied in remarks highlighted by Mediate. “I mean, if my kids had been sent to college at great expense, like millions of people across the country, I want to know that, if somebody is actually calling for the genocide of the Jews or anybody else on campus, that we’ve got a college president who will say quickly get campus police over there, that person could be a danger to other people around them.
“The Hill has reached out to Stefanik’s office for comment on Raskin’s remarks.”
Good luck with that…sycophants and rabble rousers never stand accountable.
Stefanik isn’t dumb, she’s just craven and power hungry.
Article is basically a transcription of an interview on another outlet
He has goebbels eyes.
I want to know who and what is behind Stefanik. She clearly is an opportunist playing a role. She was seemingly gone for a few years after one of the impeachments, only to resurface during the speaker election madness. And now she’s acting like an a-hole during these hearings.
It was really, really nice when I didn’t have to see her face!
To be clear, Stefanik’s questioning was super disingenuous. The question was about how you define hate speech and Magill said it depends on the context, which is true. Stefanik then went on to point that comment toward comments about Jews, which was two questions ago. Typical conservative questioning. Always have to take comments out of context to find the right straws for their agenda.
He’s right. Stefanik cares about NOTHING! She used to be a no-name moderate in congress. It wasn’t until she want full trumpian demagogue that she started getting attention. What a waste of an Ivy League degree.
I absolutely LOATHE that bish. Shes a NASTY NASTY UGLY person.
She’s all in on mushroom penis.
Chemo got to Raskins brain
Lets be real, the only reasons republicans support Israel is that Leftists support Palestinians and that they hate brown people more than they hate Jewish people.