Ein IDF-Sprecher sagt, es gebe keine Veränderungen vor Ort, nachdem Geiseln versehentlich getötet wurden

by Apprehensive_Sleep_4

25 comments
  1. IDF are making it super hard to support them, but best believe Islamaphobes and self-interested Western nations gonna find a way

  2. >He said military leadership has spoken with the soldiers who fired on the hostages and **no disciplinary action will be taken**.

    Yikes

  3. But I was told rather vehemently that they would face justice.

  4. They were just following the rules of engagement. Killing everyone that moves, even the woman and children, you just don’t lead them so much.

  5. > He said military leadership has spoken with the soldiers who fired on the hostages and no disciplinary action will be taken.

    Because they thought they were firing on unarmed Gazans—erm, I mean “Hamas terrorists setting up an ambush by being half naked and waving a white flag begging for help while also holding no weapons of any sort”

    Man, Israel/the IDF had my full throated support at the start of this war. Way to lose the PR campaign to *literal terrorists*

  6. Israelis now included as *acceptable collateral damage*. Hate boner is a powerful drug.

  7. To people commenting without reading –

    >No, there isn’t (changes to rules/orders), because it became very clear from the beginning that the soldiers who fired, they operated contrary to our rules of engagement, and they shouldn’t have fired

    The leadership is content with making sure soldiers are aware of this possibility in the future and reminding them of their orders/rules/laws. There are reasons to not reprimand these soldiers further (but that’s a long explanation and I’ll probably get flamed enough as it is).

  8. That should be a moral booster for their families and loved ones.

    How the fuck did Jonathan Conricus get the gig as the IDF spokesperson? Everything that comes out of his pie hole is controversial or plain fucked up. If I had said half the shit this dude says, I would have been fired on October 8th. He definitely has friends in high places.

  9. New IDF field training manual addendum: before firing, you must be first to yell “He’s coming right for us”

    /s

  10. World should condemn. Too many innocents dying. IDF using the excuse of its war.

    To me is a one sided war. IDF hardly lost any troops. It’s like Germany bullying countries back in the world war.

  11. So, it’s been deemed acceptable to still have soldiers on active duty who went against the rules of engagement and killed hostages *while they were waving white flags and calling for help*?

    If that’s the kind of attitude the IDF have towards their boots on the ground, then the international community needs to ask serious questions about their activity there.

  12. Well the family is gonna be angry as hell. And that would cost them a ton of support at home.

  13. The IDF are openly fine with soldiers killing any civilians in Gaza and if anybody does ..they will face no reprocussions (not that this is a new revelation).

  14. Things will only stop when Hamas is gone, they made that pretty clear. I am pretty sure that the loss if hostages is calculated by the IDF and especially Hamas. If the Israelis would stop everything just because of some casualties, the whole point of the operation would be missing.

  15. Easy to say from your couch. It sounds like you have never been in an even remotely similar situation and have no ability to judge what it’s like.

  16. IDF: „we won’t stop until the last one of the terrorists is killed”

    Replace terrorists with a word that starts with P and ends in alestininan

  17. Of course not, why would they change what is obviously intentional?

  18. The comments here are staggering. Seems like a lot of people here can’t understanding the complexity of the situation(morally and strategically). Too many people treat Palestinian and Israeli lifes like points on a score board.

    But really I shouldn’t be surprised. That’s how it is when real life clashes with internet/social media culture.

  19. There’s something a bit misleading about the title.

    >“No, there isn’t, because it became very clear from the beginning that the soldiers who fired, they operated contrary to our rules of engagement, and they shouldn’t have fired,”

  20. The soldiers concerned should be taken off the front line and put behind a desk

  21. IDF doesn’t seem to be a well disciplined army and doesn’t seem to be interested in improving itself. Happy for their soldiers to shoot anything that moves whether it’s a legitimate target or not.

Leave a Reply