MP suspended for using racist slur claims anti-racism course on expenses by HuskerDude247 Tags:United Kingdom 4 comments I can actually think of the laughable reasoning that it’s the workplaces responsibility to provide the sensitivity training. You know what would work better, voting them out. The real issue isn’t that he claimed, but the fact that it was approved. What needs to be done to stop this merry-go-round with the expenses? Surely an MP that has to go on an anti-racism course isn’t fit to be an MP? >The journalist said that told Mr Coyle that a reference to a “Chinese trope” was not appropriate and noted that he was British-Chinese. I’m struggling to decode that sentence. Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
I can actually think of the laughable reasoning that it’s the workplaces responsibility to provide the sensitivity training. You know what would work better, voting them out.
The real issue isn’t that he claimed, but the fact that it was approved. What needs to be done to stop this merry-go-round with the expenses?
>The journalist said that told Mr Coyle that a reference to a “Chinese trope” was not appropriate and noted that he was British-Chinese. I’m struggling to decode that sentence.
4 comments
I can actually think of the laughable reasoning that it’s the workplaces responsibility to provide the sensitivity training.
You know what would work better, voting them out.
The real issue isn’t that he claimed, but the fact that it was approved.
What needs to be done to stop this merry-go-round with the expenses?
Surely an MP that has to go on an anti-racism course isn’t fit to be an MP?
>The journalist said that told Mr Coyle that a reference to a “Chinese trope” was not appropriate and noted that he was British-Chinese.
I’m struggling to decode that sentence.